employee
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose of this study was electing superior Stone Pine trees to get the seeds with high genetic traits. Method. This study is carried out in four sites using four samples per site. Ten phenotypic traits of the trees in our sample are examined to determine the maximum value for each trait (measured in points out of ten). We then calculate the percentage value for each tree; weighted of each trait’s value. Then, the total number of points for each tree is calculated in order to be able to choose trees that have achieved the highest points i.e. considered superior. As a result. Four superior trees are elected from each site. Next, a one-way analysis of variance (Anova) is conducted on the superior trees in each site. The results show no significant differences between them. However, when the analysis is applied to traits, statistically significant differences are found where some traits outweigh the others in terms of the role they play in the evaluation of superior trees, and thus we can adopt these traits as basic traits for evaluate the superior trees. Scientific novels. According to this study, these superior trees can be selected as distinct mother seeds which can be used in propagation Pinus pinea.
election, superior trees, stone pine, Anova, traits
1. Pereira S., Prieto A., Calama R., Diaz-Balteiro L. Optimal management in Pinus pinea L. stands combining silvicultural schedules for timber and cone production, Spain // Silva Fennica. 2015. Vol. 49. No. 3. Pp. 1-16.
2. Loewe-Muñoz V., Balzarini M., Delard C., Álvarez A. Variability of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) fruit traits impacting pine nut yield, France // Annals of Forest Science. 2019. Vol. 76. No. 37. Pp. 1-10.
3. Weyrich L. S., Duchene S., Soubrier J., Arriola L., Llamas B., Breen J., Morris A. G., Alt K. W., Car-amelli D., Dresely V., Farrell M., Farrer A. G., Francken M., Gully N., Haak W., Hardy K., Harvati K., Held P., Holmes E. C., Kaidonis J., Lalueza-Fox C., Rasilla M., Rosas A., Semal P., Soltysiak A., Townsend G., Usai D., Wahl J., Huson D. Hv, Dobney K., Cooper A. Neanderthal behaviour, diet, and disease inferred from ancient DNA indental calculus, United Kingdom // Springer, Nature. 2017. No. 544. Pp. 357-361.
4. Akyol A., Orucu O. K. Investigation and evaluation of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) current and future potential distribution under climate change in Turkey, Turkey // CERNE. 2019. Vol. 25. No.4. Pp.v415-423.
5. Kurt R., Karayilmazlar S., İmren E., Cabuk Y. Nonwood forest products in Turkey forestry sector: Export Analysis, Turkey// Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 158-167.
6. Küçüker D. M., Baskent E. Z. State of stone pine (Pinus pinea) forests in Turkey and their economic importance for rural development, France // Options Méditerranéennes. 2017. No. 122. Pp. 111-117.
7. Sbay H., Hajib S. Le pin pignon: Une espèce de choix dans le contexte des changements Climatiques [Pinyon Pine: Species of Choice in the Context of Climate Change]. Morocco: Centre de recherches forestières, 2016. 76 p. (In French.)
8. Sattout S., Faour G. Insights on the value chain and management practices of stone pine forests in Lebanon, France // Options Méditerranéennes. 2017. No. 122. Pp. 119-124.
9. Zas R., Moreira X., Ramos M., Lima M. R. M., Nunes da Silva M., Solla A., Vasconcelos M. W, Sampedro L. Intraspecific variation of anatomical and chemical defensive traits in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) as factors in susceptibility to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) // Springer, Trees. 2015. Vol. 29. No. 3. Pp. 663-673.
10. Jaouadi W., Alsubeie M., Mechergui K., Naghmouchi S. Silviculture of Pinus Pinea L. in North Africa and The Mediterranean Areas // Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2020. Pp. 1-13.
11. Mutke S., Vendramin G. G., Fady B., Bagnoli F., González-Martínez S. C. Molecular and Quantitative Genetics of Stone Pine (Pinus pinea) // In book: Genetic Diversity in Horticultural Plants, Chapter: 3, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2019. Pp. 1-27.
12. Guadaño C., Mutke S. Establecimiento de plantaciones clonales de Pinus pinea para la producción de piñón mediterráneo [Establishment of clonal Pinus pinea orchards as Mediterranean pine nut crop] // Serie Forestal. 2015. No. 28. Pp. 79. (In Spanish.)
13. Marcu N., Budeanu M., Apostol E. N., Radu R.G. Valuation of the Economic Benefits from Using Genetically Improved Forest Reproductive Materials in Afforestation, Switzerland // Forests. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 382. Pp. 1-13.
14. Kim I. S., Lee K. M., Shim Dv., Kim J. J., Kang H. I. Plus Tree Selection of Quercus salicina Blume and Q. glauca Thunb. and Its Implications in Evergreen Oaks Breeding in Korea // Forests. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 735. Pp. 1-15.
15. Aslam M., Arshid S., Bazaz M. A., Raina P. A., Khuraijam J. S., Reshi Z. A., Siddiqi T. O. Plus tree selection and their seed germination in Pinus wallichiana A. B. Jackson from Kashmir Himalaya, India - an approach basic and fundamental in genetic tree improvement of the species // NeBIO. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 279-286.
16. Mutke S., Guadaño C., Iglesias S., Leon D., Arribas S., Gordo J., Gil L., Montero G. Selection and identification of Spanish elite clones for Mediterranean pine nut as orchard crop, France // Options Méditerranéennes. 2017. No. 122. Pp. 71-75.
17. Zhang H., Zhang Y., Zhang D., Dong L., Liu K., Wang Y. Progeny performance and selection of superior trees within families in Larix olgensis, Netherland // Euphytica. 2020. Vol. 216. No. 60. Pp. 1-11.
18. Daneva V., Dhillon R. S., Johar V. Plus tree selection and progeny testing of superior candidate plus trees (CPTs) of Ailanthus excelsa // Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 543-545.
19. Li X., Liu X. T., Wei J. T., Li Y., Tigabu M., Zhao X .Y. Genetic Improvement of Pinus koraiensis in China: Current Situation and Future Prospects, Switzerland // Forests. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 142. Pp. 1-13.
20. Buvaneswaran C., Kumar K.V., Velumani R., Senthilkumar S. Experimental Design for Evaluation of Clones of Casuarina for Windbreak Agroforestry System, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding // Tree Sciences. 2018. Vol. 37. No. 1. Pp. 11-18.
