Samara, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose of the research is to evaluate the adaptability parameters of zoned and promising varieties of spring soft wheat and to identify samples that combine high grain yield and adaptive properties for forest-steppe conditions of the Middle Volga region. The work was carried out in 2017–2020 in the central zone of the Samara region. Methods. The object of research was 12 varieties of competitive testing related to different stages of breeding. Observations and records were carried out according to the Methodology of the state variety testing of agricultural crops, assessment of the adaptability of varieties according to the methods of A. A. Goncharenko and L. A. Zhivotkov. Weather conditions in 2017–2020 were diverse and varied from the average annual values. Results. The average crop yield varied from 2.10 t/ha (2019) to 3.72 t/ha (2017), the coefficient of variation Cv = 23.8 %. Varieties with a high average grain yield (3.15–3.26 t/ha) and a smaller variation (19.9–22.5 %) were identified – Eritrospermum 6310/10-63, Lutestsens 6102/1-32, Eritrospermum 6517/24-1. The varieties Eritrospermum 6310/10-63 (–1.39), Eritrospermum 6381 (–1.50), and Kinel’skaya 59 (–1.50) had the greatest resistance to stress. Varieties Lutestsens 6045, Kinel’skaya yubileynaya, Lutestsens 6102/1-32 – differed in specific adaptation and formed the highest average grain yield (3.16–3.20 t/ha) under contrasting conditions. The average coefficient of adaptability of varieties ranged from 0.85 to 1.08. The majority of varieties (58.3 %) had a high coefficient of adaptability (greater than 1), the highest values (1.08) were the promising varieties Lutescens 6102/1-32 and Erythrospermum 6310/10-63. Scientific novelty. A new adaptive material of spring soft wheat has been isolated for use in breeding programs of the forest-steppe zone of the Middle Volga region.
spring soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), breeding, adaptability, variety, yield, weather conditions
1. Milaschenko N. Z., Trushkin S. V. Rezervy proizvodstva vysokokachestvennogo zerna pshenicy v rossiyskom zemledelii // Zemledelie. 2018. № 7. S. 30-33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/0044-3913-2018-10708.
2. Demina E. A., Kincharov A. I., Taranova T. Yu., Mullayanova O. S., Chekmasova K. Yu. Perspektivnyy sort pshenicy myagkoy yarovoy Kinel'skaya 2020 // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2021. T. 35. № 7. S. 29-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451¬_2021_35_7_29.
3. Rybas' I. A. Povyshenie adaptivnosti v selekcii zernovyh kul'tur (obzor) // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2016. T. 51. № 5. S. 617-626. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2016.5.617rus.
4. Sapega V. A., Tursumbekova G. Sh. Urozhaynost', ekologicheskaya plastichnost' i stabil'nost' sortov yarovoy myagkoy i tverdoy pshenicy v yuzhnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2020. T. 21. № 2. S. 114-123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.114-123.
5. Novohatin V. V., Dragavcev V. A. Nauchnoe obosnovanie ekologo-geneticheskoy selekcii myagkoy yarovoy pshenicy // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2020. T. 34. № 12. S. 39-46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451¬-2020-11206.
6. Demina I. F. Rezul'taty izucheniya kollekcionnyh obrazcov pshenicy myagkoy yarovoy v usloviyah Srednego Povolzh'ya // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2020. T. 21. № 6. S. 653-659. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.6.653-659.
7. Popolzuhina N. A., Popolzuhin P. V., Gaydar A. A., Parshutkin Yu. Yu., Yakunina N. A. Omskaya Yubileynaya - adaptivnyy sort yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy dlya Sibirskogo regiona // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2020. T. 181. № 4. S. 120-126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2020-4-120-126.
8. Malokostova E. I. Hozyaystvenno-biologicheskaya harakteristika sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy selekcii NIISH CChP im. V. V. Dokuchaeva // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2021. № 1 (73). S. 31-38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-73-1-31-38.
9. Baykalova L. P., Serebrennikov Yu. I. Ocenka adaptivnogo potenciala sortov tverdoy yarovoy pshenicy po urozhaynosti // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 2. S. 46-55. DOI: 1036718/1819-4036-2021-2-46-55.
10. Sidorov A. V., Neshumaeva N. A., Plehanova L. V. Adaptivnyy sort yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy Krasnoyarskaya 12 // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2020. № 4. S. 10-15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-4-10-15.
11. Evdokimov M. G., Yusov V. S., Morgunov A. I., Zelenskiy Yu. I. Zasuhoustoychivyy genofond tverdoy yarovoy pshenicy, identificirovannyy v mnogoletnih ispytaniyah pitomnikov kazahstansko-sibirskoy selekcii pshenicy // Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2017. T. 21. № 5. S. 515-522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ17.23-o.
12. Dragavcev V. A., Mihaylenko I. M., Proskuryakov M. A. Nekanonicheskiy podhod k resheniyu zadachi nasledstvennogo povysheniya zasuhoustoychivosti rasteniy (na primere hlebnyh zlakov) // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2017. T. 52. № 3. S. 487-500. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2017.3.487rus.
13. Goncharov N. P., Kosolapov V. M. Selekciya rasteniy - osnova prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii // Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2021. T. 25. № 4. S. 361-366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ21.039.
14. Zezin N. N., Vorob'ev V. A., Vorob'ev A. V., Bezgodov A. V., Nikolaeva Z. R. Yarovaya myagkaya pshenica Ekstra // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2020. № 6 (72). S. 64-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-72-6-64-70.
15. Ivanova I. Yu., Volkova L. V. Izmenchivost' hozyaystvenno cennyh priznakov yarovoy pshenicy i ih vklad v stabilizaciyu urozhaynosti // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2019. T. 20. № 6. S. 567-574. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.6.567-574.
16. Gladysheva O. V., Barkovskaya T. A. Ocenka selekcionnogo materiala pshenicy yarovoy na produktivnost' pri razlichnyh stressovyh usloviyah vneshney sredy // Agrarnaya nauka. 2017. № 11-12. S. 18-19.
17. Kincharov A. I., Taranova T. Yu., Demina E. A. Specificheskaya reakciya sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy na pogodnye usloviya // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2020. № 9. S. 61-68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-9-61-68.
18. Mal'ceva L. T., Filippova E. A., Bannikova N. Yu. Adaptivnyy potencial ishodnogo materiala v selekcii myagkoy yarovoy pshenicy // Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU. 2020. № 1 (57). S. 26-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-1462-2020-26-31.
19. Grabovec A. I., Biryukov K. N. Rol' sorta v stabilizacii proizvodstva zerna v shirokom diapazone agroklimaticheskih faktorov // Zemledelie. 2021. № 5. S. 41-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/0044-3913-2021-5-41-45.
20. Evdokimov M. G., Belan I. A., Yusov V. S., Kovtunenko A. N., Rosseeva L. P. Adaptivnyy potencial sortov pshenicy (ozimoy, yarovoy myagkoy i yarovoy tverdoy) selekcii Omskogo agrarnogo nauchnogo centra // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2020. T. 34. № 10. S. 9-15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2020-11001.
21. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur. Vyp. 1. Obschaya chast'. Moskva, 2019. 329 s.
22. Zhivotkov L. A., Morozova Z. A., Sekatueva L. I. Metodika vyyavleniya potencial'noy produktivnosti i adaptivnosti sortov i selekcionnyh form ozimoy pshenicy po pokazatelyu «urozhaynost'» // Selekciya i semenovodstvo. 1994. № 2. S. 3-6.
23. Goncharenko A. A. Ob adaptivnosti i ekologicheskoy ustoychivosti sortov zernovyh kul'tur // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii sel'skohozyaystvennyh nauk. 2005. № 6. S. 49-53.
24. Dospehov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta. Moskva: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 s.
