Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy zaochnyy universitet
employee
Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the scientific community, politicians and practitioners with the main results of the research on identifying opportunities of using the experience of European Union member states in the organization and implementation of support for rural areas in the current domestic environmental conditions, taking into account their significant fluctuations. In the course of the work, various overview and analytical research methods were used. Also, the EU legislation, on the basis of which state policy in the field of rural development is currently being implemented, was carefully studied. To formulate recommendations, the most significant results of domestic and foreign scientific research published in recent years were summarized. As a result, as the main elements (directions, mechanisms, tools) of the European policy of support for rural development, worthy of attention for the development of a similar domestic policy, the article presents such of them as a general (comprehensive) approach to organizing support for rural areas and the agricultural sector of the economy, to defining its goals, priorities, implementation measures; experience in using local initiative groups to implement national and European plans to address issues of social, environmental, climatic development agenda in a situation of today's challenges and threats, as well as the practice of implementing measures of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on rural development, relying on farms and agricultural cooperatives; options for applying social and technological innovations for “revitalizing” underdeveloped rural areas;for integrated (rural and urban) development of rural areas adjacent to urban centers. The scientific and practical significance of the proposed recommendations lies in their meaningfulness and timeliness.
European Union, rural areas, government support, Common Agricultural Policy, international experience
1. Report from The Commission to the European Parliament and the Council 14-th Financial Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) 2020 Financial Year [e-resource]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ ?uri=CELEX:52021DC0539 (date of reference: 19.12.2021)
2. Nazzaro C., Marotta G. The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020: Scenarios for the European Agricultural and Rural Systems // Agricultural Economics. 2016. No. 4. Article number: 16
3. Carey M. The Common Agricultural Policy’s New Delivery Model Post-2020: National Administration Perspective // EuroChoices. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 11-17.
4. Alons G., Zwaan P. New Wine in Different Bottles: Negotiating and Selling the CAP post-2013 Reform // Sociologia Ruralis. 2015. No. 56 (3). Rp. 349-370.
5. Dupraz P., Guyomard H. Environment and Climate in the Common Agricultural Policy // EuroChoices. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 18-25.
6. Roth S., Valentinov V., Kaivo-oja J., Dana L.-P. Multifunctional Organisation Models // Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2018. No. 31 (7). Pr. 1383-1400.
7. Cheng Z., Wang H., Xiong W., Zhu D., Cheng L. Public-Private Partnership as a Driver of Sustainable Development: Toward a Conceptual Framework of Sustainability-Oriented PPP // Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021. No. 23. Rr. 1043-1063.
8. Pawłowska A. Territorial Partnerships in Rural Regions - Neo-Institutional Perspective // Polish Sociological Review. 2017. No. 1. Rr. 95-108.
9. Servillo L., De Bruijn M. From LEADER to CLLD: the Adoption of the New Fund Opportunities and of their Local Development Options // European Structural and Investment Funds Journal. 2018. No. 6. Rr. 223-233.
10. Kokot J. ECA Audits of the CAP Highlight Issues that Tie into the Recent Agreement on the Future of the CAP // ECA Journal. 2021. No. 2. Rr. 61-66.
11. Mohd Som R., Omar Z., Ismail I. A., Alias S. N. Understanding Leadership Roles and Competencies for Public-Private PartnerShip // Journal of Asia Business Studies. 2020. No. 14. Rr. 541-560.
12. Neumeier S. Social Innovation in Rural Development: Identifying the Key Factors of Success // Geographical Journal. 2017. No. 183. Rp. 34-46.
13. Unnevehr L. J. Between Farmers and Consumers // Nature Food. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 392-393.
14. Arora N. K. Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Production and its Sustainable Solutions // Environmental Sustainability. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 95-96.
15. Kim K. The Characteristics of Practical Farm for Young Farmers // The Journal of Rural Society. 2021. No. 31 (1). Pp. 363-396.
16. Petit M. Another Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy: What to Expect // EuroChoices. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 34-39.
17. Golovina S. G., Smirnova L. N., Ruchkin A. V. Education Is an Important Factor of Human Capital Development in Rural Territories // E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 282 (2). Article number 08006.
18. Golovina S., Mikolaychik I., Poltarykhin A., Zhuravlev P. The Impact of Human Capital on the Success of an Agricultural Cooperative (example of “Arla Foods”) // Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 2. Rp. 262-283.
