RASPBERRY BREEDING FOR RESISTANCE TO FUNGAL DISEASES
Rubrics: BIOLOGY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. The purpose search for the possibility of creating raspberry genotypes with complex resistance to major fungal diseases. Scientific originality. 30 varieties and forms of raspberries, as well as hybrid stock from 8 combinations of crosses were evaluated according to the degree of resistance to the main pathogens. Methods. The work was carried out on the collection and breeding plots of raspberry of the Kokino base of the Federal State Budgetary Research Center of Horticulture in 2019–2021, according to the main provisions of generally accepted methods of breeding and cultivar studies. The assessment was carried out on a natural infectious background on a five-point scale, where 5 points – high resistance, there are no defeats, 0 points - low resistance, more than 50 % of the leaf apparatus and stems were defeated. Results. The dependence of the susceptibility of genotypes to fungal diseases depending on climatic conditions has been established. Forms with high resistance to individual pathogens have been identified. Ivan Kupala, Patritsiya, Lavina, Brigantina, Sputnitsa, Newburg and selections 11-126-1, 8-10x-1, 18-11-2 are attributed to the sources of resistance to didymella (resistance score 4.0-4.5 points); the cultivars Mariya, Glen Ample, Meteor, Zhuravlik were attributed to anthracnose; and the cultivars Cowichan, Mariya, Zhuravlik and Selection 11-126-1 – septoria spot. The degree of their defeat in the years with the maximum development of the disease did not exceed 1.0 point. The most promising combinations of crossing for resistance to didymella were combinations of crossing Brigantina × Lavina, 8-6-3 × Cowichan, Skromnitsa × Fenomen, 18-11-2 × 11-126-1; to anthracnose – Brigantina × Lavina, Ulybka × 8-6-3, Gusar × 8-6-3, Gusar × Vol’nitsa, 18-11-2 × 11-126-1; to septoria spot – Ulybka × Vol’nitsa and Gusar × Vol’nitsa. The forms are allocated from the hybrid fund 2-60-1, 2-61-2, 2-58-1, 2-58-2 and 2-58-3 were identified as valuable as a new initial material for further raspberry breeding to increase the level of resistance to major pathogens.

Keywords:
raspberry, breeding, didymella, anthracnose, septoria spot, crossing combinations
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Dale A. Next steps in breeding for yield in raspberries // Acta Hortic. 2020. No. 1277. Rr. 11-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1277.2.

2. Ançay A., Carlen C., Christ B. Optimization of long-cane red raspberry production by the control of fruiting lateral number // Acta Hortic. 2020. No. 1277. Rr. 191-194. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1277.27.

3. Lupin M. V. Ocenka ustoychivosti maliny krasnoy k gribnym boleznyam v usloviyah Orlovskoy oblasti // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2020. № 6 (87). S. 184-188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2020.6.184.

4. Sycheva I. V., Sazonov F. F., Luscheko V. P., Ermakov R. I. Biologicheskaya i hozyaystvennaya effektivnost' primeneniya fungicidov pri zaschite smorodiny chernoy ot naibolee vredonosnyh bolezney // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2019. T. 56. S. 169-175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2019-56-169-175.

5. Evdokimenko S. N. Skrining geneticheskoy kollekcii maliny remontantnogo tipa po polevoy ustoychivosti k boleznyam // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2019. T. 58. S. 138-143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2019-58-138-143.

6. Bogomolova N. I., Mitina E. V., Lupin M. V. Adaptaciya maliny krasnoy k osnovnym listovym pyatnistostyam pri vozdelyvanii v usloviyah Central'noy Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sovremennoe sadovodstvo - Contemporary horticulture. 2017. № 4 (24). S. 68-76. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/adaptatsiya-maliny-krasnoy-k-osnovnym-listovym-pyatnistostyam-pri-vozdelyvanii-v-usloviyah-tsentralnoy-rossii (data obrascheniya: 17.05.2022)

7. Graham J., Brennan R. (ed.). Raspberry: breeding, challenges and advances. // Springer. 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6.

8. Perekopskiy A. N., Yunin V. A., Zykov A. V., Egorova K. I. Agrotehnicheskoe obespechenie vedeniya matochnyh nasazhdeniy maliny krasnoy na osnove adaptirovannyh ekologicheski bezopasnyh priemov // Izvestiya Mezhdunarodnoy akademii agrarnogo obrazovaniya. 2021. № 56. S. 28-33.

9. Asaturova A., Shternshis M., Tsvetkova V., Shpatova T., Maslennikova V., Zhevnova N. & Homyak A. Biological control of important fungal diseases of potato and raspberry by two Bacillus velezensis strains // PeerJ. 2021. Vol. 9. Article number e11578. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11578.

10. Mitchell C., Hawes C., Iannetta P., Birch A. N. E., Begg G., & Karley A. J. An agroecological approach for weed, pest and disease management in Rubus plantations // Raspberry. 2018. Rr. 63-81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_5.

11. Dolan A., MacFarlane S., Jennings S. N. Pathogens in Raspberry and Other Rubus spp. // Raspberry. 2018. Rr. 41-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_4.

12. Mozhar N. V. Podbor ustoychivyh k osnovnym boleznyam sortov grushi, perspektivnyh dlya vozdelyvaniya na yuge Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs] // Plodovodstvo i vinogradarstvo Yuga Rossii. 2017. № 46 (4). URL: http://journal.kubansad.ru/pdf/17/04/01.pdf (data obrascheniya: 17.05.2022).

13. Rodyukova O. S. Fitosanitarnaya ocenka gibridnyh seyancev smorodiny krasnoy // Selekciya i sortorazvedenie sadovyh kul'tur. 2018. T. 5. № 1. S. 110-112.

14. Belyaev A. A., Baklanova G. I., Kuz'mina A. A., Panina E. N. Ustoychivost' sortov maliny k vreditelyam i boleznyam v lesostepi Priob'ya // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. T. 49. S. 48-51.

15. Bogomolova N. I., Lupin M. V. Uroven' adaptivnosti maliny krasnoy k osnovnym steblevym i listovym pyatnistostyam v usloviyah yuga Central'no-chernozemnogo regiona Rossii // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2021. № 5 (92). S. 21-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.5.21.

16. Sazonov F. F., Luscheko V. P. Vliyanie sortovoy ustoychivosti i pogodnyh usloviy na razvitie antraknoza smorodiny chernoy v usloviyah Bryanskoy oblasti // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. T. 49. S. 290-294.

17. Kazakov I. V., Gryuner L. A., Kichina V. V. Malina, ezhevika i ih gibridy // V knige: Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyh, yagodnyh i orehoplodnyh kul'tur ; pod red. E. N. Sedova i T. P. Ogol'covoy. Orel, 1999. S. 184-185.

18. Kichina V. V. Selekciya maliny i ezheviki // V knige: Programma i metodika selekcii plodovyh, yagodnyh i orehoplodnyh kul'tur ; pod red. E.N. Sedova. Orel, 1995. S. 368-386.

19. Dospehov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta s osnovami statisticheskoy obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovaniya. Moskva, 1985. 351 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?