employee
Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose of the study is assess the performance of a variety of different types of vehicles used in agricultural production. Methods. An interpretation of the technical and economic indicators characterizing agricultural transport is proposed, the features of determining the productivity of a tractor transport unit, the cost of one transported ton are considered. Probability theory was used to determine the indicators “Load waiting time”, “Vehicle loading time”. The conditions of operation of vehicles as part of harvesting and transport complexes are considered. Results. Based on the field research, when harvesting corn for silage, the economic efficiency of the use of vehicles was determined. A comparative analysis was carried out using cars and tractor transport units. As a result of the research, it was revealed that for energy-saturated tractors, with tractor trailers corresponding to them in traction properties, the productivity is higher than for MTZ-82 tractors with trailers PST-9 and 2PTS-6 by 2.1–2.3 times than for KamAZ-5511 vehicles by 1.9 times. At the same time, unit costs are lower by 10–-13 % and 5.7 %, respectively. It is recommended that agricultural organizations harvesting fodder crops ensure the optimal ratio of forage harvesters and vehicles; if possible, when transporting green mass, use energy-saturated tractors with appropriate tractor trailers and heavy trucks with trailers. The scientific novelty consists in clarifying and supplementing such technical and economic indicators that characterize the operation of vehicles in agriculture, such as Coefficient of use of working time, Coefficient of use of load capacity, etc. Mathematical dependencies are proposed to calculate these indicators and assess their impact on transport economics.
technologies, costs, road transport, tractor transport units, indicators, productivity, economic efficiency, random variable, field research, green mass
1. Valge A. M., Suhoparov A. I., Papushin E. A. Formirovanie uborochno-transportnogo kompleksa dlya zagotovki silosa // Agroekoinzheneriya. 2021. № 1(106). S. 70-82.
2. Busato P., Sopegno A., Pampuro N., Sartori L., Berruto R. Optimisation tool for logistics operations in silage production. Biosystems Engineering. 2019. No. 180. Pp. 146-160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.01.008.
3. Valge A., Sukhoparov A., Papushin E. Strategic planning of grass forage production in north-west Russia // Agronomy Research. 2021. Vol. 19. Special issue 2. Pp. 1188-1194.
4. Valge A. M., Suhoparov A. I. Vybor gruzopod'emnosti transportnyh sredstv pri zagotovke kormov iz podvyalennyh trav // Agroekoinzheneriya. 2022. № 2 (111). S. 107-116.
5. Brusencov A. S., Abdullin R. F. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika mashin dlya zagotovki kormov // Alleya Nauki. 2018. T 6. № 6 (22). S. 587-590. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35349189 (data obrascheniya: 16.09.2022).
6. Valge A, Sukhoparov A, Papushin E, Dobrinov A. Evaluation effectiveness of forage harvesters in silage preparation // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 699. Article number 012050. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/699/1/012050.
7. Seregin M. V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka tehnologiy zagotovki ob'emistyh kormov // Tavricheskiy nauchnyy obozrevatel'. 2017. № 4 (21). S. 162-163.
8. Izmaylov A. Yu., Lobachevskiy Ya. P., Marchenko O. S., Cench Yu. S. Sozdanie innovacionnoy tehniki i resursosberegayuschih tehnologiy proizvodstva kormov - osnova razvitiya zhivotnovodstva // Vestnik Federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo uchrezhdeniya vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya «Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy agroinzhenernyy universitet imeni V. P. Goryachkina». 2017. № 6. S. 23-28.
9. Timshin D. I., Ushakov A. O., Kurbanov R. F., Saitov V. E. Raschet uborochno-transportnogo zvena // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovaniy. 2017. № 6-2. S. 205-210.
10. Pehutov A. S., Kalashnikov S. S., Radnaev D. N., Sergeev Yu. A., Altaeva O. A., Babaev M. S. Graficheskaya i analiticheskaya model' transportnogo processa v sel'skom hozyaystve // Vestnik VSGUTU. 2022. № 2 (85). S. 49-55.
11. Vorob'ev S. P., Gricenko G. M., Vorob'eva V. V., Valeckaya T. I. Finansovoe sostoyanie sel'skohozyaystvennyh organizaciy pri razlichnom sochetanii otrasley // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2017. № 12. S. 36-39.
12. Vorotnikova O. S., Maystrenko N. A. Analiz transportnogo obespecheniya proizvodstvennyh processov v usloviyah AO «Zelenogradskoe» // Elektrotehnologii i elektrooborudovanie v APK. 2021. T. 68. № 4 (45). S. 62-67.
13. Radzhabov A. A. Mesto i rol' transporta v ustoychivom razvitii sel'skih territoriy // Politehnicheskiy vestnik. Seriya: Inzhenernye issledovaniya. 2018. № 4 (44). S. 92-98.
14. Registraciya nadstavnyh (naroschennyh) bortov na primere avtomobilya KAMAZ 5511 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://tex-exp.ru/zaregistrirovano/gruzovye/registratsiya-nadstavnykh-bortov-na-kamaz-5511 (data obrascheniya: 26.09.2022).
15. Iovlev G. A., Goldina I. I. Formirovanie uborochno-transportnogo kompleksa na zagotovke senazha // Nauchno-tehnicheskiy vestnik: Tehnicheskie sistemy v APK. 2021. № 3 (11). S. 4-19.
16. Iovlev G. A., Nesgovorov A. G., Goldina I. I. Issledovanie raboty i formirovanie sostava uborochno-transportnogo kompleksa iz zernouborochnyh kombaynov zarubezhnogo proizvodstva // Sel'skohozyaystvennye mashiny i tehnologii. 2020. T. 14. № 4. S. 49-56.
17. Iovlev G. A., Zorkov V. S. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zarubezhnogo i otechestvennogo traktora: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Teoriya i praktika mirovoy nauki. 2020. № 1. S. 13-16.
