Abstract. The purpose is to assess the impact of the intensity of agricultural land use on the level of their economic efficiency. Methodology and methods. In the course of the study, nonparametric statistical methods were used to identify dependencies in the data set. When constructing predictive models, ROC analysis was used to find the values of the cut off point. Results. The study made it possible to localize three groups of regions of the Russian Federation that differ quite significantly in terms of the intensity of land use and are characterized by a sufficiently high level of dispersion within the groups. The analysis of the interrelations between the parameters characterizing the intensity level allowed us to identify factors that influence economic efficiency: the degree of ploughing of agricultural land, the share of reclaimed land in the area of farmland and the degree of use of arable land, the latter of which has the most significant influence. The ROC analysis regarding the degree of use of arable land as a potential predictive parameter for increasing land yield showed that its threshold value at the cut off point is 63.8 %, above which the maximum values of economic efficiency are achievable. The scientific novelty lies in the formation of the evidence base of the dependence of economic efficiency on the level of intensity of land use, necessary for understanding the mechanisms of formation of rational parameters of land use.
agriculture, land resources, region, regional features, intensity, efficiency, land allocation, management mechanism, land policy
1. Demidov P. V., Ulez'ko A. V. Strategicheskoe upravlenie zemlyami sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya: suschnost', principy i ocenka effektivnosti // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018. № 2 (57). S. 237-247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2071-2243.2018.2.237.
2. Sushkova T. Yu., Ivanova N. A. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zemli v sel'skom hozyaystve regiona // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2021. № 10. S. 39-44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/2110-39.
3. Minakov I. A. Problemy ispol'zovaniya zemel' sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya [Elektronnyy resurs] // Nauka i obrazovanie. 2021. T. 4. № 1. URL: http://opusmgau.ru/index.php/see/article/view/2856/2855 (data obrascheniya: 25.03.2023).
4. Medelyaeva Z. P., Kiselev M. E. Sravnitel'naya ocenka effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya zemel'nyh resursov hozyaystvuyuschimi sub'ektami agrarnoy sfery Voronezhskoy oblasti // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2021. T. 14. № 4 (71). S. 110-117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.53914/issn2071-2243_2021_4_110.
5. Buhtoyarov N. I. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zemel'nyh resursov v regione // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2019. № 1. S. 13-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/191-13.
6. Komov N. V. O sozdanii sistemy edinogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya zemel'nymi resursami Rossii // Zemleustroystvo, kadastr i monitoring zemel'. 2019. № 1 (168). S. 5-8.
7. Hlystun V. N. Razvitie zemel'nyh otnosheniy v agropromyshlennom komplekse // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2019. T. 89. № 7. S. 669-677.
8. Bezaev I. I., Gagarinova A. V. Puti povysheniya effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya zemel'nyh resursov // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2022. № 11. S. 14-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/2211-14.
9. Dessart F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé J., Van Bavel R. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review // In: European Review of Agricultural Economics. Oxford University Press. 2019. Vol. 46. Pr. 417-471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019
10. Gliessman S. Evaluating the impact of agroecology // Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2020. No. 4 (8). Pp. 973-974. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1774110.
11. Klimentova E. A., Dubovickiy A. A., Smyslova O. Yu. Racional'noe ispol'zovanie zemel'nyh resursov kak faktor povysheniya ustoychivosti sel'skogo hozyaystva // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. T. 16. № 1 (76). S. 143-155.
12. Monahov S., Shihanova Yu., Potockaya L. Teoreticheskie aspekty razvitiya «zelenoy» ekonomiki v sel'skom hozyaystve Rossii: ekologizaciya sel'skohozyaystvennogo zemlepol'zovaniya // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2019. № 10. S. 15-19.
13. Montanarella L., Panagos P. The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European green deal // Land Use Policy. 2021. Vol. 100. Article number 104950. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950.
14. Postolov V. D., Bryanceva L. V. Innovacionnye zadachi v zemleustroystve i zemlepol'zovanii // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. T. 13. № 3 (66). S. 204-208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2071-2243.2020.3.204.
15. Dubovickiy A. A., Klimentova E. A. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zemel'nyh resursov: metodicheskiy aspekt // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2019. № 7. S. 18-23.
16. Dubovickiy A. A., Minakov I. A. Regional'nye osobennosti intensivnosti ispol'zovaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh zemel' // Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. № 2 (73). S. 175-178.
