Russian Federation
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Perm', Perm, Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose of the study is to examine the patterns of sectoral development of rural territorial systems in conditions of modern economic uncertainty using the example of a number of regions of the Russian Federation. The results of the work of modern authors in the field of rural economics and agricultural production are summarized and interpreted, which made it possible to calculate forecasts for the development of agricultural sectors in the Volga Federal District and the Perm Territory of the Russian Federation for the period until 2030. The scientific novelty lies in the assessment of the sectoral development of agro-industrial territorial systems, through the study of the dynamics of the main indicators of agricultural activity using trend analysis in a fairly short period of modern economic uncertainty, which is a significant step forward in this area of scientific research. To identify the dynamics and forecast the development of the main sectors of agricultural production, methods were used to graphically identify linear dependence and construct linear trends using homogeneous statistical indicators. The main results of the study are the developed measures for the stable sectoral development of rural areas of the Russian Federation in modern conditions and overcoming the existing regional differentiation. The implementation of measures involves the introduction of innovative solutions that provide an adaptive response to market trends and changes in the influence of external factors in the regional management of sectoral development of rural areas. Thus, the study provides a basis for understanding the components of sectoral development of rural areas and allows us to identify ways to constructively solve complex and multifaceted problems associated with the stabilization of agricultural production. The practical significance of the proposed solutions lies in their relevance in the activities of regional government authorities and relevant departments in the processes of improving the management of sectoral development of rural areas as part of the implementation of strategic documents for the spatial and sectoral development of the Russian Federation.
agricultural sectors, rural territorial systems, region, agricultural products, structure of the agricultural sector, economic forecasts, economic uncertainty, sustainable development
1. Grohmann P., Feindt P. H. The importance of calibration in policy mixes: Environmental policy integration in the implementation of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy in Germany (2014–2022) // Environmental Policy and Governance. 2023. Vol. 34, No. 2. DOI: 10. 1002/eet.2052.
2. Christiaensen L., Rutledge Z., Taylor J. E. Viewpoint: The future of work in agri-food // Food Policy. 2021. Vol. 99. Article number 101963. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101963.
3. Dudek M., Wrzochalska A. Between competitiveness and sustainability? Achievements and dilemmas of regional policy in the context of economic development of rural regions: the case of Poland // European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2019. Vol. 8, No. 2. Pp. 299–311.
4. Haan E., Haartsen T., Meier S., Strijker D. Understanding the success of rural citizens’ initiatives: Perspectives of founders // Journal of Rural Studies. 2019. Vol. 70. Pp. 207–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.11.001.
5. Tessier L., Bijttebier J., Marchand F., Baret P. V. Pathways of action followed by Flemish beef farmers – an integrative view on agroecology as a practice // Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2020. Pp. 111–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1755764.
6. Jungsberg L., Copus A., Herslund L. B., Randall L., Berlina A. Key actors in community-driven social innovation in rural areas in the Nordic countries // Journal of Rural Studies. 2020. Vol. 79, No. 2. Pp. 276–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004.
7. Tricheur A., Reau R., Choisis J.-P., Meynard J.-M. Traque aux pratiques innovantes pour contrôler les adventices en Agriculture Biologique // Agronomie, Environnement & Sociétés. 2022. Pp. 1775–4240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54800/pot693.
8. Galanakis C. M. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis // Foods. 2020. Vol. 9. Article number 523. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040523.
9. Daugbjerg C., Schvartzman Y. Organic Food and Farming Policy in Denmark / Edited by Caroline de la Porte et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 25–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856296.003.0002.
10. Lamine C., Magda D., Amiot M.-J. Crossing sociological, ecological, and nutritional perspectives on agrifood systems transitions: towards a transdisciplinary territorial approach. 2019 // Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11, No. 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051284.
11. Krasilnikova L. E. Spatial and sectoral development of the region based on the development of agro-industrial territorial and supply chain management in economic systems // International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2019. Vol. 8, No. 4. Pp. 834–844.
12. Ferreira Guiné R. d. P., Pato de Jesús M. L., Amaro da Costa C., de Vasconcelos Texeira Aguiae da Costa D., Barracosa Correia da Silva P., Pereira Domibgued Martinho V. J. Food Security and Sustainability: Discussing the Four Pillars to Encompass Other Dimensions // Foods. 2021. Vol. 10. Article number 2732. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112732.
13. Meuwissen M., Feindt P. H., Spiegel A. et al. A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems // Agricultural Systems. 2019. Vol. 176, No. 2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102656.
14. Łaźniewska E., Boháč A., Kurowska-Pysz J. Asymmetry as a factor weakening resilience and integration in the sustainable development of the Polish-Czech borderland in the context of the dispute about the Turów mine // Problemy ekorozwoju. 2022. Vol. 18, No. 1. Pp. 139–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.14.
15. Fortes A. R., Ferreira V., Simoes E. B. et al. Food Systems and Food Security: The Role of Small Farms and Small Food Businesses in Santiago Island // Agriculture-Basel. 2020. Vol. 10, No. 6. DOI: 10.3390/ agriculture10060216.
16. Federal'naya gosudarstvennaya statisticheskaya sluzhba [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru (data obrascheniya: 14.12.2023).
17. Krasil'nikova L. E., Balandin D. A., Fedoseeva S. S. Osobennosti prostranstvenno-otraslevogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy Volgo-Kamskogo makroregiona // International Agricultural Journal. 2021. T. 64, № 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0209-2021-10345.
18. Minakir P. A., Dzhurka N. G. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya prostranstvennyh issledovaniy v ekonomike // Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018. T. 88 (7). S. 589–598. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/s086958730000082-8.
19. Naumov I. V. Issledovanie mezhregional'nyh vzaimosvyazey v processah formirovaniya investicionnogo potenciala territoriy metodami prostranstvennogo modelirovaniya // Ekonomika regiona. 2019. T. 15, № 3. S. 720–735. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-8.
20. Tret'yakova L. A., Astahin A. S. Prostranstvennoe razvitie territoriy: sostoyanie, tendencii, kompleksnyy podhod k ocenke differenciacii regionov (territoriy) // Vestnik universiteta. 2020. № 4. S. 107–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-4-107-114.
21. Zakshevskiy V. G., Merenkova I. N., Novikova I. I., Kusmagambetova E. S. Metodicheskiy instrumentariy diagnostiki diversifikacii sel'skoy ekonomiki // Ekonomika regiona. 2019. T. 15, № 2. S. 520–533. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-2-16.
22. Petuhova M. S. Issledovanie dinamiki urozhaynosti zerna v Rossii v kontekste nauchno-tehnologicheskogo razvitiya otrasli rastenievodstva // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2021. № 1 (204): S. 81‒90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2021-204-01-81-90.
