Russian Federation
The article examines the regional aspects of the complexity of the agrarian economy. The purpose of the study is to gain new knowledge about the level and prospects of development of various categories of agricultural producers of the subjects of the North Caucasus Federal District (NCFD) in the context of their contribution to the food supply of the country and the region. The research methodology included the use of various methods of abstract-logical, computational-constructive, economic-statistical, dialectical, analytical, monographic, graphic, etc. methods. The scientific novelty of the study is to identify the features of the current stage of the development of the diversity of the agricultural sector of the subjects of the North Caucasus Federal District and substantiate the main directions for improving its effectiveness, taking into account the national specifics of the society of the region. Results. The trends of preservation and development of both large-scale agricultural production (Stavropol Krai) and small forms of management (most national republics) have been established. So, if in the Stavropol Krai the share of large business accounts for almost 70 %, then in the Republic of Dagestan – no more than 15 %. Households of the population dominate here (78 %). In the Kabardino-Balkar Republic, the share of peasant (farm) farms in the structure of agricultural production is more than 40 %. The factors determining the peculiarities of the agricultural sector of the region are investigated, a significant territorial and sectoral differentiation by categories of producers of the district is established. The necessity of developing a multi-layered economy is substantiated, taking into account the specifics of the functioning of each form of management, organizational and economic support measures from federal, regional and local authorities. The importance and prospects of the development of large-scale production and small entrepreneurship in agriculture are determined, taking into account their contribution to the food supply of the region. The necessity of selective state support for the realization of economic interests is argued.
diversified economy of the region, agriculture, territorial and sectoral differentiation, forms of management, small-format sector of the economy, state support
1. Baliyanc K. M. Strategicheskie podhody innovacionnogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo okruga // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2022. № 10. S. 42–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/2210-42. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IXDCKA
2. Kaschaev I. V., Kriulina E. N. Konceptual'nye mehanizmy povysheniya ustoychivosti sel'skohozyaystvennoy deyatel'nosti sub'ektov Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo okruga // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2022. № 1. S. 3–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/221-3. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VDQLEL
3. Kriulina E. N., Kaschaev I. V., Oganyan L. R. Ustoychivost' razvitiya sel'skohozyaystvennogo proizvodstva SKFO // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2022. T. 36, № 5. S. 92–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2022_36_5_92. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CSVUFH
4. Edinaya mezhvedomstvennaya informacionno-statisticheskaya sistema. [Elektronnyy resurs] // EMISS. Gosudarstvennaya statistika. URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/30950 (data obrascheniya: 25.05.2023).
5. Produkciya sel'skogo hozyaystva v fakticheski deystvovavshih cenah (okonchatel'nye dannye). Gosudarstvennaya statistika. URL:. https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/43337 (data obrascheniya: 15.04.2023).
6. Sel'skohozyaystvennaya mikroperepis' 2021 goda. [Elektronnyy resurs] Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/75792 (data obrascheniya: 23.05.2023).
7. Isaeva O. V. Prognoznaya model' razvitiya agrarnoy struktury agropromyshlennogo kompleksa yuga Rossii // Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. № 103. S. 45–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-103-45-51. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MIZYUH
8. Klimenko A. I., Usenko L. N., Holodova M. A. Prognozirovanie prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti regiona v kontekste ekonomicheskoy dostupnosti produktov pitaniya // Melioraciya i gidrotehnika. 2022. T. 12, № 1. S. 264–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2022-12-1-264-283. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QIMVBL
9. Kaschaev I. V., Kriulina E. N. Koncepciya ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo okruga v usloviyah territorial'noy i otraslevoy differenciacii // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2022. № 3. S. 50–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/223-50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EUCZJZ
10. Voitleva Z. A. Sravnitel'nyy analiz effektivnosti sel'skohozyaystvennogo proizvodstva razlichnyh form hozyaystvovaniya // Rossiyskaya sel'skohozyaystvennaya nauka. 2019. № 3. S. 42–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500-26272019342-46. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FOLJFL
11. Mittal D., Yadav K., Kaur G., et al. Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook // Frontiers in Nanotechnology. 2020. Vol. 2. Article number 579954. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2020.579954. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QHCQVL
12. Chaplitskaya A., Heijman W., van Ophem J., Kusakina O. Innovation policy and sustainable regional development in agriculture: A case study of the Stavropol Territory // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13, No. 6. Article number 3509. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063509. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KTALYU
13. Asma A. L. I., Perna S. Sustainability indicators in Agriculture: A Review and Bibliometric analysis using Scopus database // Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development. 2021. Vol. 115, No. 2. Pp. 5–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36253/JAEID-12083. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JIVXHY
14. Zhichkin K. A., Nosov V. V., Abdulragimov I. A., et al. The food security concept as the state support basis for agriculture // Agronomy Research. 2021. Vol. 19, No. 2. Pp. 629–637. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.097. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RATZFX
15. Usenko L. N., Chernysheva Y. G., Guzey V. A., et al. Problems and perspectives of cluster formation in view of sustainability of development of regional business structures of the Russian Federation // International Journal of Trade and Global Markets. 2017. Vol. 10, No. 2-3. Pp. 160–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2017.086074. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XOHDDY
16. Anichin V. L., Dorofeev A. F., Yurchenko Yu. N. Ekonomicheskie granicy sel'skohozyaystvennogo proizvodstva v samostoyatel'nyh organizaciyah // Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 102. S. 13–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-102-13-18. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EUXWLM
17. Miroshnichenko T. A., Krinichnaya E. P. Sel'skohozyaystvennaya kreditnaya potrebitel'skaya kooperaciya kak instrument finansovoy inklyuzivnosti na sele // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2021. № 8 (211). S. 75–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2021-211-08-75-87. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATZCLA
18. Muhametgaliev F. N., Hafizov D. F., Hismatullin M. M. [i dr.] Voprosy razvitiya malyh form hozyaystvovaniya i kooperacii v sel'skoy mestnosti // Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2019. T. 14, № 1(52). S. 138–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5ccedf76d50a12.50893731. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WYJOFF
19. Maslova V. V., Chekalin V. S., Avdeev M. V. Agricultural Development in Russia in Conditions of Import Substitution // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019. Vol. 89, No. 5. Pp. 478–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619050058. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HCTLTW
20. Kusnandar K., Kooten O., Brazier F.M. Supporting self-organisation in farmer organisations in developing countries: A case with a group of farmer groups in Indonesia // Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2023. Vol. 11, Iss. 2. Article number 100214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2023.100214. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SKIIFJ
