Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose is to determine the influence of a phytocomposition with antioxidant properties on the economically useful indicators of bees of the Central Russian breed. Methods of the research. The scientific and production experiment was carried out in a stationary apiary in the Malopurginskiy district of the Udmurt Republic. The object of the study was honey bees of the Central Russian breed. Experimental tests on the use of the herbal medicine were carried out on the basis of generally accepted zootechnical methods in beekeeping. The scientific novelty. In the natural and climatic conditions of the Udmurt Republic, in a stationary apiary, for the first time, studies were carried out to test a biological product as part of a carbohydrate supplement on bees of the Central Russian breed and its effectiveness of use was determined. A stimulating liquid feed additive for bees is developed on the basis of a standard water-insoluble antioxidant dihydroquercetin, a polysaccharide arabinogalactan and rosehip decoction. The bioavailability of dihydroquercetin is achieved through its extraction, followed by evaporation of the alcohol and mixing with arabinogalactan, a good deliverer of sparingly soluble molecules. The positive effect of the antioxidant drug on the bee biosystem is enhanced by rosehip nutrients. Results. The experimental group that received the organic supplement exceeded the control group in terms of egg-laying intensity by an average of 27.6 % (1194 eggs). The lag in the development of families in the control group was reflected in honey productivity: the amount of gross honey harvest was 29.0 kg, which is 38.6 % lower than the same value for experienced families. Flower honey obtained in the experimental group was distinguished by high enzymatic activity and a higher content of invert sugars in the form of fructose and glucose: 10.65 units. Gothe and 96.28 %, respectively, against the control values of 8.30 units. Gothe and 78.10 %. In terms of the amount of profit received from the sale of products, the experimental group exceeded the control families by 3.507 rubles, which also affected production efficiency: the profitability level was 37.7 % against the control families – 0.65 %. Thus, the spring feeding of bees with a supplement enriched with a biocomposition contributed to the achievement of a biological optimum in the strength of the colonies before the main honey harvest, which affected their productivity.
honey bee, environmental safety, fertilizing, herbal medicine, dihydroquercetin, arabinogalactan, rosehip decoction, antioxidants, bioavailability, egg production, family strength, honey productivity, diastase
1. Kulakov V. N. Uchet prodolzhitel'nosti zimovki pchel pri ocenke znachimosti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federacii dlya pchelovodstva // Agrarnaya nauka. 2020. № 5. S. 91–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2020-338-5-91-95. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LXLWAP
2. Pashayan S. A., Sidorova K. A., Yurina T. A. Nekotorye voprosy povysheniya zhiznestoykosti pchel v usloviyah tehnogeneza // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 3 (168). S. 88–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-3-88-92. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PEVVYD
3. Fedorova A. S., Vorob'eva S. L., Vasil'eva M. I. Stimuliruyuschaya proteinsoderzhaschaya podkormka i ee effektivnost' v pchelovodstve // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 5 (97). S. 245–250. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VNWBHD
4. Domackiy A. N., Domackaya T. F. Rasprostranenie askosferoza pchel na pasekah Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2022. № 6 (183). S. 105–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-6-105-111. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MOYEIS
5. Vorobieva S. L., Mikheeva E. A., Shishkin A. V., Sterkhova D. O., Mushtaleva E. D. The spread of bee diseases in the Udmurt Republic depending on territorial characteristics and climatic conditions // Journal of Entomological Research. 2021. Vol. 45. Pp. 996–1003. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2021.00158.4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RPFUJN
6. Scherbakov P. N., Scherbakova T. B., Abdyramanova T. D., Zhuravel' N. A., Stepanova K. V. Terapevticheskaya effektivnost' preparatov, primenyaemyh dlya lecheniya varroatoza pchel // Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 1 (207). S. 74–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.53083/1996-4277-2022-207-1-74-79. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QXWLVC
7. Tuktarov V., Valitov F., Schelechov D., Farkhutdinov R., Yumaguzhin F. Effect of plant extract preparations on microbial number and species composition of the honey bee intestinal microbiocenosis throughout the overwintering period // Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2022. Vol. 10, No. 1. Pp. 203–211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17582/JOURNAL.AAVS/2022/10.1.203.211. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZQKFFA
8. Kulakov V. N., Brandorf V. N. Biological Resources of Entomophilous Plants and Melliferous Bees in Russia // Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2021. Vol. 12, No. 1. Pp. 539–544. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2021.1.77. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DQGGWJ
9. Magomedov M. Sh., Mannapov A. G., Hrapova S. N., Kutlin Yu. N. Vliyanie sborki gnezda s trutnevymi sotami i stimuliruyuschih podkormok na zimostoykost' pchelinyh semey // Pchelovodstvo. 2023. № 8. S. 6–8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GJCAQO
10. Mannapov A. G., Krichevcova A. N., Kutlin Yu. N. Biologicheskie pokazateli pchelinyh semey na fone stimuliruyuschih podkormok // Glavnyy zootehnik. 2021. № 11 (220). S. 53–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33920/sel-03-2111-06. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EMHOPF
11. Zalilova Z. A., Mannapov A. G., Lukyanova M. T., Kovshov V. A. Strategies of Regional Economic and Sustainable Development: The Case of the Beekeeping Industry // In: Bogoviz A. (ed.) The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 2021. Vol. 205, No. 1. Pp. 855–862. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73097-0_95. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SBYLTU
12. Tuktarov V. R., Il'yasova Z. Z., Manurova E. R. Primenenie rastitel'nyh sredstv bor'by pri bakterial'noy infekcii lichinok pchel // Agrarnyy vestnik Primor'ya. 2021. № 2 (22). S. 44–46. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTDMUH
13. Yaroshevich G. S., Mazina G. S., Kuz'min A. A. Vliyanie biologicheski aktivnyh veschestv na uvelichenie prodolzhitel'nosti zhizni i fiziologicheskoe sostoyanie pchel // Izvestiya Velikolukskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2019. № 2. S. 33–40. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UVNRFO
14. Tuktarov V. R., Andreeva A. V., Il'yasova Z. Z. Primenenie vodnyh ekstraktov i spirtovyh nastoek rastitel'nogo proishozhdeniya v pchelovodstve // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii veterinarnoy mediciny im. N. E. Baumana. 2022. T. 249, № 1. C. 214–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31588/2413_4201_1883_1_249_214. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CHIIYT
15. Uglov V. A., Boroday E. V. Rol' arabinogalaktana i digidrokvercetina v lechenii sel'skohozyaystvennyh zhivotnyh po dannym patentnyh issledovaniy // Innovacii i prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost'. 2022. № 1 (35). S. 103–107.
16. Sayed A. A., Vorob'ev A. N., Sinicyna N. I., Abramovich R. A., Potanina O. G. Primenenie arabinogalaktana pri razrabotke tabletok s digidrokvercetinom // Mediko-farmacevticheskiy zhurnal Pul's. 2022. T. 24. № 5. S. 128–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2022-24-5-128-136. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WMTMCP
17. Es'kov E. K., Rozhenkov A. S., Shestakova E. V., Fomichev Yu. P., Mazina G. S., Yaroshevich G. S. Effektivnost' arabinogalaktana pri nozematoze // Pchelovodstvo. 2022. № 2. S. 24–27. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJLLZC
