Abstract. Relevance. Industrial grape culture necessitates the formation of highly productive plantings. The grafted grape culture in comparison with the native one solves a number of problems of industrial viticulture. However, the increased costs for the production of grafted seedlings in comparison with root-related ones necessitate a reduction in the cost of their production, which can be achieved by reducing the length of the underground stem, and obtaining the largest amount of harvest can be achieved by the correct selection of the rootstock variety. Goal. Selection, for grafted Prestizh grape seedlings, of the optimal length and rootstock variety, with an assessment of the impact on biometric indicators. Research methods. The methods of setting up the experience and analyzing the data obtained were used in the work, which are generally accepted in the practice of nursery breeding. Results. The ripening of seedlings on the Kober 5 BB rootstock variety varied from 12 to 41 % in relation to length, which is significantly less than on the 101-14 rootstock variety, from 24 to 52 %. Analyzing the influence of the rootstock variety on biometric indicators and the quality of shoots, the best responsiveness of the Prestizh graft variety to the rootstock variety 101-14 was noted. The rootstock variety had the greatest influence on the quality of seedlings. With the Kober 5 BB rootstock variety, the final yield of seedlings was low and varied from 8.1 to 37.2%. An increase in the yield of seedlings was observed with the rootstock of the Riparia × Rupestris 101-1 variety, which was 30-48%, which is more than when using the Kober 5 BB rootstock (by 1.3–3.7 times). Practical significance. According to the research results, there was a tendency to increase the final yield of seedlings with a decrease in the length of the rootstock from 45 cm (standard rootstock length) to 30 cm for both varieties. Scientific novelty. The responsiveness of the Prestizh graft variety in the production of grafted grape seedlings to reduce the length of the rootstock, depending on its variety, was revealed.
vinograd, pitomnikovodstvo, privitoy sazhenec, shkolka, dlina podvoya, affinitet, vyhod sazhencev
1. Il'ina I. A., Popova D. V., Petrov V. S. [i dr.] Razrabotka algoritma prinyatiya resheniy pri podbore sortov pod konkretnye pochvenno-klimaticheskie usloviya [Elektronnyy resurs] // Plodovodstvo i vinogradarstvo Yuga Rossii. 2022. № 74 (2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30679/2219-5335-2022-2-74-1-16. URL: http://journalkubansad.ru/pdf/22/02/01.pdf (data obrascheniya: 08.06.2022).
2. Zameta O. G., Ivanchenko V. I., Ivanova M. I. [i dr.] Anatomiya sovmestimosti tehnicheskih sortov vinograda (Vitis Vinifera), privityh na fillokseroustoychivye podvoynye sorta // Izvestiya sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki Tavridy. 2022. № 29 (192). S. 35-45.
3. Pavlyuchenko N. G., Zimina N. I., Kolesnikova O. I. [i dr.] Affinitet sorta vinograda Golubok s osnovnymi podvoynymi sortami // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 10 (175). S. 74-79.
4. Silva M. J. R., Paiva A. P. M., Pimentel A. J. et al. Yield performance of new juice grape varieties grafted onto different rootstocks under tropical conditions // Scientia Horticulturae. 2018. No. 241. Rp. 194-200.
5. Tecchio M. A., Silva M. J. R., Callili D. et al. Yield of white and red grapes, in terms of quality, from hybrids and Vitis labrusca grafted on different rootstocks [e-resource] // Scientia Horticulturae. 2020. No. 259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108846. URL: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US202100184599 (date of reference: 08.06.2022).
6. Bidabadi S. S., Afazel M., Sabbatini P. Iranian grapevine rootstocks and hormonal effects on graft union, growth and antioxidant responses of asgari seedless grape // Horticultural Plant Journal. 2018. Vol. 4. Iss. 1. Rp. 16-23.
7. Titova L. A., Magomadov A. S., Avdeenko I. A., Grigoriev A. A. Development of grafted grape seedlings depending on the length and variety of rootstock [e-resource] // IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 723. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/723/2/022085. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/723/2/022085/pdf (date of reference: 08.06.2022).
8. Ivanchenko V. I., Zameta O. G., Potanin D. V. [i dr.] Pitomnikovodstvo. Opredelenie stepeni affiniteta (sovmestimosti) sortopodvoynyh kombinaciy u vinograda i plodovo-yagodnyh kul'tur: uchebnoe posobie. Simferopol': Poliprint, 2021. 82 s.
9. Borisenko M. N., Belinskiy Yu. A. Vyhod privityh sazhencev vinograda v shkolke i ih kachestvo v zavisimosti ot sistemy vedeniya matochnika podvoynyh loz «Magarach» // Magarach. Vinogradarstvo i vinodelie. 2017. № 4. S. 30-32.
10. Ivanchenko V. I., Zotikov A. Yu., Smychkova S. A. Vliyanie sorto-podvoynyh kombinaciy na vyhod i kachestvo privityh cherenkov i sazhencev vinograda «Magarach» // Magarach. Vinogradarstvo i vinodelie. 2018. № 1. S. 12-15.
11. Arestova N. O., Ryabchun I. O. Filloksera vinograda // Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 2017. № 2. S. 34-36.
12. Petrov V. S., Pavlyukova T. P. Zakladka embrional'nyh socvetiy i realizaciya potenciala hozyaystvennoy produktivnosti u sortov vinograda v usloviyah umerenno-kontinental'nogo klimata Yuga Rossii // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2018. T. 53. № 3. S. 616-623.
13. Novikova L. Yu., Naumova L. G. Dependence of fresh grapes and wine taste scores on the origin of varieties and weather conditions of the harvest year in the northern zone of industrial viticulture in Russia [e-resource] // Agronomy. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/723/2/022085. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/10/1613 (date of reference: 08.06.2022).
14. Calugar A., Pop N., Bunea C. I. et. al. The economic impact of paraffin type and substrate mixture on the production of grafted vines-case study muscat ottonel [e-resource] // Agronomy. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 10. DOI: /10.3390/agronomy10101584. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/10/1584 (date of reference: 08.06.2022).
15. Batukaev A. A., Malykh G. P., Magomadov A. S. et. al. New technological solutions for the production of planting material of grapes // Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 581-587.
16. Valentini G., Allegro G., Pastore C. et al. Climate change and vine training systems: the influence different spatial distribution of shoots may have on sugar accumulation in Sangiovese grapevines [e-resource] // BIO Web of Conferences. 2019. No. 3. Article number 04006. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191304006. URL: https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2019/02/bioconf_conavi2018_04006.pdf (date of reference: 17.06.2022).
17. Silva M. J. R., Maia Paiva A. P., Pimentel Junior C. et al. Yield performance of new juice grape varieties grafted onto different rootstocks under tropical conditions [e-resource] // Scientia Horticulturae. 2018. Vol. 241. Pp. 194-200. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326391897_Yield_performance_of_new_juice_grape_varieties_grafted_onto_different_rootstocks_under_tropical_conditions (date of reference: 17.06.2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.085.
18. Gomes E. P., Borges C. V., Monteiro G. C. et al. Preharvest salicylic acid treatments improve phenolic compounds and biogenic amines in ‘Niagara Rosada’ table grape [e-resource] // Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2021. Vol. 176. Article number 111505. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111505. URL: https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/7296572 (date of reference: 17.06.2022).
19. Novikova L. Yu., Naumova L. G. Analiz hozyaystvenno cennyh priznakov sortov vinograda razlichnogo proishozhdeniya iz kollekcii VNIIViV v usloviyah klimaticheskih izmeneniy // Nauchnye trudy SKFNCSVV. 2018. № 19. S. 113-119.
20. Borisenko M. N., Belinskiy Yu. A. Vyhod privityh sazhencev vinograda v shkolke i ih kachestvo v zavisimosti ot sistemy vedeniya matochnika podvoynyh loz // Magarach. Vinogradarstvo i vinodelie. 2017. № 4. S. 30-32.
21. Prestizh [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://vinograd.info/sorta/vinnye/prestizh.html (data obrascheniya: 17.06.2022).
22. Riparia × Rupestris 101-14 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://vinograd.info/sorta/ostalnoe/riparia-x-rypestris-101-14.html (data obrascheniya: 17.06.2022).
23. Kober 5BB [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://vinograd.info/sorta/vinnye/denisovskii.html (data obrascheniya: 17.06.2022).
24. Maltabar L. M., Mel'nik N. I. Produktivnost' podvoynyh sortov vinograda i regeneracionnaya aktivnost' cherenkov // Pitomnikovodstvo vinograda. Krasnodar: SKZNIISVV, 2004. S. 82-91.
25. Kolesnik L. V. Vinogradarstvo. Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske, 1968. 440 s.
26. GOST 31783-2012 «Posadochnyy material vinograda (sazhency). Tehnicheskie usloviya». Moskva: Standartinform. 2013. 12 s.
27. Mel'nik S. A., Schiglovskaya V. I. Ampelometricheskiy metod opredeleniya ploschadi listovoy poverhnosti vinogradnogo kusta // Trudy Odesskogo sel'skohozyaystvennogo instituta. 1957. T. 8. S. 82-88.
28. Maltabar L. M., Zhdamarova A. G. Metodiki provedeniya agrobiologicheskih uchetov i nablyudeniy po vinogradarstvu. Krasnodar: Kubanskiy SHI, 1982. 28 s.
