Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Abstract. Purpose. A study was carried out to assess the influence of the inbreeding coefficient, calculated according to the Wright – Kislovsky formula, and level of homozygosityon calculated on STR-markers the indicators of the assessment of breeding value according to the linear assessment of the exterior. Methods. The object of the study were the daughters (n = 42 245) of 355 Black-and-White and Holstein sires in the Moscow region. The calculation was made taking into account at least 10 daughters per sire. The entire data array for EBV amounted to 42076 heads of cattle, for 318 sires and was divided into four groups with respect to (Fx): the first included outbred animals (0 %), the second with Fx = 0…3.125, the third with Fx = 3.126…6.25, in the fourth with Fx ≥ 6.25, and in the fifth all animals except outbreds. For the STR calculation, the total sample was 306 sires for 39,590 daughters. So, the first group included heterozygous individuals Ca = 0 %, the second individuals with Ca = 8…50 %, the third with Ca = 55…77 %, the comparison group consisted of individuals with Ca = 8…77 %, which is on average sample 28.74 %. Results. It was noted that there was no significant difference “classic” calculation by means of gradation of the coefficient inbreeding between the studied groups of animals, with the exception of body depth, rear legs set, teat length, chest width and angularity (p ˂ 0.05... – p ˂ 0.001) according to the “B” rating system. The results of calculations by STR markers in general had similar dependencies: the angle of the hind legs in the side view from –0.055 in the first group to 0.109 in the third, the location of the front nipples from –0.129 to 0.179. The regression coefficient increased along with the minimum number of daughters per sire used in the calculations in terms rear legs set, rear udder height and udder depth. Scientific novelty. For the first time in Russia, the influence of the astimated breeding value according to the linear assessment of the conformation, depending on the coefficient of inbreeding and the level of homozygosity, calculated by STR markers, will be investigated.
Black-and-White breed, Holstein breed, body type estimates, estimated breeding value, homozygosity, exterior, inbreeding coefficient, microsatellites, FX, EBV, STR
1. Yengo L., Zhu Z., Wray N. R., Weir B. S., Yang J., Robinson M. R., Visscher P. M. Detection and quantification of inbreeding depression for complex traits from SNP data // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017. Vol. 114. Pp. 8602-8607.
2. Caballero A., Villanueva B., Druet T. On the estimation of inbreeding depression using different measures of inbreeding from molecular markers // Evolutionary Applications 2021. Vol. 14. Pp. 416-428.
3. Kardos M., Nietlisbach P., Hedrick P.W. How should we compare different genomic estimates of the strength of inbreeding depression? // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018. Vol. 115. Pp. 2492-2493.
4. Nedashkovskiy I. S., Sermyagin A. A., Bogdanova T. V., Ermilov A. N., Yanchukov I. N., Zinov'eva N. A. Ocenka vliyaniya urovnya inbridinga na molochnuyu produktivnost' i vosproizvoditel'nye kachestva korov golshtinizirovannoy populyacii cherno-pestroy porody // Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo. 2018. № 7. S. 17-22.
5. Nedashkovskiy I. S., Kostyunina O. V., Volkova V. V., Ermilov A. N., Sermyagin A. A. Ocenka plemennoy cennosti bykov-proizvoditeley golshtinskoy porody po kachestvu potomstva v svyazi s urovnem gomozigotnosti po STR-markeram [Elektronnyy resurs] // Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrotehnologicheskogo universiteta im. P. A. Kostycheva. 2019. № 3 (43). S. 36-43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36508/RSATU.2019.43.41328. URL: http://vestnik.rgatu.ru/archive/2019_3.pdf#page=36 (data obrascheniya: 20.09.2022).
6. Sidorova V. Yu., Popov N. A. Osobennosti priznakov teloslozheniya, svyazannyh s vosproizvodstvom u docherey inbrednyh i autbrednyh bykov // Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo. 2017. № 2. S. 15-17.
7. Doekes H. P., Veerkamp R. F., Bijma P., de Jong G., Hiemstra S. J., Windig J. J. Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in Dutch Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle // Genetics Selection Evolution. 2019. Vol. 51. Pp. 1-16
8. Makanjuola B. O., Maltecca C., Miglior F., Schenkel F. S., Baes C. F. Effect of recent and ancient inbreeding on production and fertility traits in Canadian Holsteins // BMC Genomics. 2020. Vol. 21 Article number: 605. URL: https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-07031-w (date of reference: 12.11.2022).
9. Han W., Xue Q., Li G., Yin J., Zhang H., Zhu Y., Xing W., Cao Y., Su Y., Wang K. Genome-wide analysis of the role of DNA methylation in inbreeding depression of reproduction in Langshan chicken // Genomics. 2020. Vol. 112. Pp. 2677-2687.
10. Doekes H. P., Bijma P., Windig J. J. How Depressing Is Inbreeding? A Meta-Analysis of 30 Years of Research on the Effects of Inbreeding in Livestock // Genes. 2021. Vol. 12. Article number. 926. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12060926.
11. Erohin, A. I., Soldatov A. P., Filatov A. I. Inbriding i selekciya zhivotnyh. Moskva: Agropromizdat, 1985. 155 s.
12. Peakall R., Smouse P. E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and researchan update // Bioinformatics. 2012. Vol. 28. Pp. 2537-2539.
13. Savenko N. A. Selekcioner Podmoskov'ya. Moskva: MSHiP MO, 2006. 84 s.
14. Misztal I., Tsruta S., Strabel T. et. al. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) // Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Montpellier, 2002. Vol. 28 (27). Pp. 21-22.
15. Nedashkovskiy I. S., Sermyagin A. A., Kostyunina O. V., Volkova V. V., Gladyr' E. A., Yanchukov I. N. Populyacionno-geneticheskaya harakteristika, ocenka genomnogo inbridinga i gomozigotnosti krupnogo rogatogo skota cherno-pestroy i golshtinskoy porod po STR i SNP markeram v Rossii // Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Biologiya. 2021. № 4. S. 295-306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9952-2021-4-295-306.
16. Konte A. F., Nedashkovskiy I. S., Ermilov A. N., Sermyagin A. A. Vliyanie urovnya inbridinga bykov-proizvoditeley na pokazateli tipa teloslozheniya ih docherey // Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo. 2022. № 4. S. 19-25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33943/MMS.2022.26.83.003.
17. Howard J. T., Pryce J. E., Baes C., Maltecca C. Invited review: Inbreeding in the genomics era: Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and management of genomic variability // Journal of Dairy Science. 2017. Vol. 100. Pp. 6009-6024.
18. Baes C. F., Makanjuola B. O., Miglior F., Marras G., Howard J. T., Fleming A., Maltecca C. Symposium review: The genomic architecture of inbreeding: How homozygosity affects health and performance // Journal of Dairy Science. 2019. Vol. 102. Pp. 2807-2817.
19. Maltecca C., Tiezzi F., Cole J. B., Baes C. Symposium review: Exploiting homozygosity in the era of genomics - Selection, inbreeding, and mating programs // Journal of Dairy Science. 2020. Vol. 103. Pp. 5302-5313.
20. Martikainen K., Koivula M., Uimari P. Identification of runs of homozygosity affecting female fertility and milk production traits in Finnish Ayrshire cattle // Scientific Reports. 2020. Vol. 10. Article number: 3804. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-60830-9?error=cookies_not_supported&code=cee74166-3ad8-4504-921d-cfae4e469a23 (date of reference: 12.11.2022).
