THE EFFECT OF NEW FEED ADDITIVES ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF RED STEPPE COWS
Rubrics: BIOLOGY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. In dairy cattle breeding, feeding rations directly affect the general condition of animals, indicators of productive and reproductive capacity, as well as the level of nutritional and biological value of the raw materials obtained. The most important task of modern domestic cattle breeding is the development of balanced diets enriched with various feed additives, in particular, prebiotic orientation. The introduction of various prebiotics into the diet of first-calf heifers of the Red Steppe breed has an important practical significance. The aim of the work is to study the effect of new prebiotic feed additives “LaktuVet” and “LaktuSuper” on the productive ability of first-calf heifers, as well as on the qualitative and quantitative composition of the milk obtained. Methods. An experimental study was carried out at the dairy complex “Breeding farm – collective farm named after Lenin” of Surovikinsky district of the Volgograd region. During the experiment, it was planned to distinguish three groups of cows – the control and two experimental ones. The control group was fed with a standard diet approved at the complex. The experimental group I was fed with a standard diet with the introduction of the feed additive “LaktuVet” at a dose of 0.5 % by weight of the feed. For feeding the II experimental group, a standard diet was used with the introduction of the feed additive “LaktuSuper” 0.5 % of the mass of the consumed compound feed. The scientific novelty lies in obtaining new knowledge about the effect of new prebiotic feed additives on the productivity of cows, as well as changes in the physicochemical composition of the resulting milk. Results. It was found that the use of new prebiotic feed additives in the diets of first-calf cows contributed to an increase in the amount of milk received in animals of the I experimental group by 5.59 %, in analogues of the II group – by 8.07 % compared with the control group. The introduction of feed additives into the diet of the studied cows had a positive effect on the quality of the milk produced and its amino acid composition.

Keywords:
dairy cattle breeding, productivity of cows, lactation period, LaktuVet, LaktuSuper, milk yield, diet, feed additives, prebiotics
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Podgorskaya S. V. Rezervy povysheniya urovnya tehnologicheskogo razvitiya molochnogo zhivotnovodstva // Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2019. № 1-1 (31). S. 81-86.

2. Galsanova B. S., Itygilova E. Yu., Ishigenov I. V. Perspektivy razvitiya molochnogo zhivotnovodstva DFO dlya obespecheniya funkcionirovaniya rynka sel'skohozyaystvennoy produkcii // Vestnik Akademii znaniy. 2022. № 53 (6). S. 62-64.

3. Nikitin E. A., Kirsanov V. V., Matveev V. Yu. Sravnitel'nyy analiz sistem prigotovleniya kormovoy smesi i ih vliyanie na effektivnost' v molochnom zhivotnovodstve // Vestnik NGIEI. 2019. № 11 (102). S. 37-46.

4. Petrova O. G. Razrabotka i osvoenie innovaciy v rossiyskom molochnom zhivotnovodstve // Medicus. 2021. № 3 (39). S. 8-14.

5. Smirnova Yu. M., Litonina A. S., Platonov A. V. Sovremennye tendencii molochnogo zhivotnovodstva: rezul'taty eksperimenta po primeneniyu biopreparatov v kormlenii zhivotnyh. Vologda: VolNC RAN, 2021. 131 s.

6. Lomov V. N., Abilova E. V. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya molochnogo zhivotnovodstva v fermerskih hozyaystvah // APK Rossii. 2019. T. 26. № 3. S. 351-356.

7. Kondrat'eva O. V., Fedorov A. D., Slin'ko O. V. Otrasl' molochnogo zhivotnovodstva v cifrah // Aktual'nye voprosy molochnoy promyshlennosti, mezhotraslevye tehnologii i sistemy upravleniya kachestvom. 2020. T. 1. № 1 (1). S. 259-264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37442/978-5-6043854-1-8-2020-1-259-264.

8. Hramcov A. G., Dykalo N. Ya., Shkola S. S., Eremina A. I., Anisimov G. S., Rudkovskiy A. V. Laktuvet - bifidogennaya pischevaya dobavka buduschego // Agrarno-pischevye innovacii. 2022. № 1 (17). S. 17-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2022-17-17-29.

9. Hramcov A. G., Eremina A. I., Shkola S. S., Anisimov G. S., Abilov B. T., Kulincev V. V., Marynich A. P., Dzhafarov N. M., Nikolaenko V. P., Dykalo N. Ya. Belkovo-uglevodnye kormovye dobavki s laktulozoy v racionah laktiruyuschih korov // Veterinariya. 2021. № 3. S. 59-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2021.24.3.59-62.

10. Hramcov A. G., Eremina A. I., Shkola S. S., Dykalo N. Ya., Abilov B. T., Kulincev V. V., Dzhafarov N. M. O., Marynich A. P., Nikolaenko V. P. Povyshenie molochnoy produktivnosti laktiruyuschih korov // Molochnaya promyshlennost'. 2022. № 3. S. 60-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2022-03-60-61.

11. Kamyshanov A. Faktory molochnoy produktivnosti korov v usloviyah sovremennogo hozyaystva // Znanstvena Misel. 2022. № 62 (62). S. 3-6.

12. Seregin I. G., Abdullaeva A. M., Satyukova L. P., Kozak Yu. A. Organolepticheskaya ocenka pri vetsanekspertize syr'ya i produkcii zhivotnogo proishozhdeniya. Moskva: Izdatel'skiy dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka», 2022. 212 s.

13. Papusha N. V., Bermagambetova N. N., Kubekova B. Zh., Smailova M. N. Chemical composition of cows' milk as an indicator of feeding value. 3i: Intellect, Idea, Innovation. 2022. No. 2. Pp. 59-67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52269/22266070_2022_2_59.

14. Kislyakova E. M., Achkasova E. V., Vladykina E. L., Berezkina G. Y., Bass S. P., Azimova G. . Alternative sources of protein in the diets of highly productive cows // Revista Electronica de Veterinaria. 2022. Vol. 23. No. 2. Pp. 7-13.

15. Gorelik O. V., Galushina P. S., Knysh I. V., Bobkova E. Yu., Grigoryants I. A. Relationship between cow milk yield and milk quality indicators // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Krasnoyarsk, 2021. Article number 32013. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/3/032013.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?