STRATEGIC FORECASTS OF PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM OF THE PRODUCTS PHYSICAL AND ECONOMIC ACCESSIBILITY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. Purpose. Preparation of forecasting models to describe the balance of domestic production and domestic consumption of products, taking into account the new mission of strategic planning of the agri-food sector, related to ensuring physical and economic accessibility at the level of rational consumption rates for every citizen of the country. The implementation of the mission is based on the scientific position on food independence in the process of solving food problems. At the present stage, there is a significant potential for increasing the production and consumption of products per capita to the level of rational norms recommended by the Russian Ministry of Health. The fundamental difficulty in solving the problem is due to the lack of balance between the pace of formation of physical and economic accessibility. Methods. Scientific and theoretical generalization of the simulation capabilities of Western European forecasting models, econometric description of physical accessibility depending on economic accessibility for the main types of products. Information support was a set of all-Russian data on resources and their use by types of products for the period 1990–2021, prepared on the basis of the author's methodology for strategic planning of the food balance. Scientific novelty lies in the development of functional models of partial equilibrium of the agri-food market, showing the dependence of physical accessibility on economic accessibility for the main types of products. Results. The calculation results show that the stimulation of physical accessibility through the formation of economic accessibility will lead to improvement and stabilization of the situation in terms of self-sufficiency of rational consumption rates. The resulting models can be used by the participants of strategic planning and management bodies as tools to support the adoption of strategic decisions to determine the level of formation of the physical availability of products when the level of consumption of rational norms is reached and, on this basis, to make adjustments to the strategic documents for the development of the agro-industrial complex.

Keywords:
forecasting models, agri-food sector, food security, physical accessibility, economic accessibility, rational consumption rates, domestic consumption, domestic production
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Samygin D. Yu. Koncepciya strategicheskogo planirovaniya v sfere prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2021. № 2. S. 14-20.

2. Afoncev S. A. Problemy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii v kontekste rynochnoy transformacii // Social'no-ekonomicheskaya transformaciya v Rossii: nauchnye doklady Moskovskogo obschestvennogo nauchnogo fonda. 2001. Vyp. 131. S. 15-42.

3. Gumerov R. R. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost': novye podhody k analizu soderzhaniya i ocenke // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2020. № 5 (182). S. 133-141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S107570072005007X.

4. Keleinikova S. V., Imyarekov S. M., Kataikina N. N. et al. Diagnostics and optimization of the vegetable market // Ponte. 2017. Vol. 73, No. 3. Pp. 270-283.

5. Zakshevskiy V. G., Bogomolova I. P., Rodionova N. S., Shaykin D. V. Realizaciya proektov v sfere produktovoy diversifikacii kak faktor povysheniya ekonomicheskogo potenciala otraslevogo predpriyatiya // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2022. № 7. S. 26-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2022-0-7-26-34.

6. Semin A. N., Kurdyumov A. V., Mescheryagina V. A. Prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost': social'no-ekonomicheskie effekty v usloviyah rasprostraneniya koronavirusnoy infekcii // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2022. № 10. S. 2-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/2210-2.

7. Sutygina A. I. Nacional'naya prodovol'stvennaya nezavisimost' v usloviyah krizisa // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2020. № 6. S. 2-8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/206-2.

8. Gur'yanova N. M., Pozubenkova E. I., Sologub N. N., Rassypnova Yu. Yu. Ocenka urovnya fizicheskoy dostupnosti prodovol'stviya Penzenskoy oblasti po otdel'nym vidam sel'skohozyaystvennoy produkcii // Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 2 (69). S. 234-239.

9. Sbitnev N. A., Chernov S. A. Strategicheskoe planirovanie razvitiya APK v obespechenii ekonomiko-prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2022. Specvypusk «Ekonomika». S. 80-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-228-13-80-89.

10. Kozhakhmetova G. A., Lashkareva O. V., Taipov T. A. Food security as a priority of agricultural policy / G. A. Kozhakhmetova // Problems of AgriMarket. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 43-49.

11. Isaeva O. V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i prognoznaya model' razvitiya agrarnoy struktury otechestvennogo APK // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2022. № 06 (221). S. 78-87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-221-06-78-87.

12. Gusmanov R., Salimova G., Stovba E., Paptsov A., Gusmanow N. Scenario Forecasting of the Agri-Food Sphere in Rural Territories Development in the Conditions of Digital Economy Formation // Journal of Industrial Integration and Management: Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2022. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 257-272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862222500063.

13. Samygin D. Yu., Baryshnikov N. G., Mizyurkina L. A. Modeli scenarnogo prognozirovaniya razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva regiona // Ekonomika regiona. 2019. T. 15. № 3. S. 865-879. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-18.

14. Aivazian S., Afanasiev M., Kudrov A. Indicators of Regional Development Using Differentiation Characteristics // Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2018. Vol. 14. Iss. 3. Pp. 7-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-3.1.

15. Karelina M. G., Mkhitarian V. S. Econometric approach to classification of branches of the Russian economy at the corporate integration level // Prilozhenie matematiki v ekonomicheskih i tehnicheskih issledovaniyah. 2019. № 1 (9). S. 45-48.

16. Samygin D. Yu. Metodika strategicheskogo planirovaniya prodovol'stvennogo balansa: napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya i rezul'taty aprobacii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2021. T. 16. № 3. S. 291-302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2021-3-291-302.

17. Korneiko O. V., Rogaleva N. L. The threats to food security // Amazonia Investiga. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 16. Pp. 232-242.

18. FAO predstavila mezhdunarodnyy opyt po sokrascheniyu poter' prodovol'stviya i pischevyh othodov [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.fao.org/russian-federation/news/detail-events/ru/c/1178597 (data obrascheniya: 25.04.2022).

19. Global'naya iniciativa FAO SAVE FOOD. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.save-food.org (data obrascheniya: 11.07.2022).

20. Krylatyh E., Belova T. Importozameschenie v kontekste garmonizacii agroprodovol'stvennoy sfery Rossii // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2016. № 1. S. 58-64.

21. Uchenye vyyasnili, kak razval kolhozov povliyal na vybrosy parnikovyh gazov [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/science_news/o_2089988 (data obrascheniya: 08.04.2023).

Login or Create
* Forgot password?