Abstract. Winter rye is grown in a variety of soil and climatic conditions, which indicates the evolutionary resistance to the action of abiotic stressors. Due to periodic spring-summer droughts in the conditions of the North-West region of the Russian Federation, the problem of drought tolerance in rye is of particular importance. The purpose of this study was to investigate 13 winter diploid rye collection varieties for drought tolerance and adaptability in the Northwestern region of the Russian Federation and to identify the most promising ones. Methods. Experiments were laid from 2018 to 2022 in a field plot located in the Northwestern region. To determine the drought tolerance of varieties we used indices: average productivity (AP), endurance index (TOL), yield stability index (YSI), drought tolerance index (DI), tolerance index (STI), geometric average productivity (GAP), drought tolerance index (DSI), agronomic drought tolerance (Adt), degree of yield reduction (X3). To calculate adaptability, the following indicators were used: d% - yield range in %, V% - coefficient of variation, Er – response effect, Ca – adaptability coefficient, Ci – intensity coefficient, d t/ha – yield range in t/ha. Results. The study years can be classified as drought years 2018, 2019, and 2022. The average yield in these years ranged from 3.6 t/ha for the variety Niva, to 4.99 t/ha for the variety Lota. Years 2020 and 2021 are favorable, with average yields ranging from 6.3 t/ha for the variety Niva, to 9.9 t/ha for the variety Ofeliya. The most drought-resistant varieties are Lota, Zubrovka, Talisman, Niva, Yaselʼda, the most adaptive are Zubrovka, Era, Ofeliya, Talisman, Yaselʼda. Of the listed methods of determining drought tolerance, we should pay attention to the Yield Stability Index (YSI) and Drought Tolerance Index (DI). To identify adaptability: the coefficient of adaptability (Ca) and the coefficient of intensity (Ci). Scientific novelty. Consists in a comparative assessment of yield drought tolerance and adaptability of winter rye varieties and identifying among them possessing a set of economically useful features and resistant to drought conditions of the North-West region.
winter rye, yield, indices, stress resistance, rank, adaptability
1. Kobylyanskiy V. D., Kuznecova L. I., Soloduhina O. V. [i dr.] Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya nizkopentozanovoy rzhi dlya hlebopekarnyh celey // Rossiyskaya sel'skohozyaystvennaya nauka. 2018. № 6. S. 3-6.
2. Timina M. A., Kobylyanskiy V. D., Butkovskaya L. K. Ispol'zovanie pervichnogo semenovodstva ozimoy rzhi // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2020. № 5. S. 48-53.
3. Nikitina V. I., Kolichenko A. A. Ocenka ekologicheskoy stabil'nosti sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy na sortouchastkah Krasnoyarskogo kraya // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2019. № 3. S. 58-64.
4. Pakul' V. N., Martynova S. V., Androsov D. E. Ocenka adaptivnoy sposobnosti i stabil'nosti yarovogo yachmenya v usloviyah severnoy lesostepi Kuzneckoy kotloviny // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2018. T. 32. № 1. S. 32-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2018-10106.
5. Manukyan I. R., Basieva M. A., Miroshnikova E. S., Abiev V. B. Ocenka adaptivnosti genotipov ozimoy pshenicy k zasushlivym usloviyam predgornoy zony Central'nogo Kavkaza // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2019. № 5 (184). S. 16-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/article_5d5151b14b9cf7.14014444.
6. Chekanin S. G., Os'kin A. A., Seyfulina Sh. [i dr.] Ocenka vliyaniya razlichnyh tipov zasuh na produktivnost' vozdelyvaniya kul'tur // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. № 1 (81). S. 19-23.
7. Mal'ceva L. T., Filippova E. A., Bannikova N. Yu., Kataeva N. V. Vliyanie zasuh na hozyaystvenno cennye priznaki yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy v usloviyah lesostepnoy zony Kurganskoy oblasti // Vestnik Omskogo GAU. 2021. № 3 (43). S. 25-34.
8. Nemcev S. I., Sharipova R. B. Ocenka agrometeorologicheskih pokazateley atmosfernyh zasuh i urozhaynost' zernovyh kul'tur v izmenyayuschihsya usloviyah regional'nogo klimata // Izvestiya Samarskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2020. Vyp. 1. S. 10-16.
9. Muhitov L. A., Timoshenkova T. A. Sorta yarovoy tverdoy pshenicy, adaptirovannye k usloviyam stepi Ural'skogo regiona // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2021. № 3 (89). S. 15-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2021-89-3-15-19.
10. Ionova E. V., Lihovidova V. A., Lobunskaya I. A. Zasuha i gidrotermicheskiy koefficient uvlazhneniya kak odin iz kriteriev ocenki stepeni ee intensivnosti (obzor literatury) // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2019. № 6 (66). S. 18-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2019-66-6-18-22.
11. Maksyutov N. A., Zorov A. A., Skorohodov V. Yu. [i dr.] Urozhaynost' sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur v usloviyah zasuhi stepnoy zony yuzhnogo Urala // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2019. № 5 (79). S. 20-23.
12. Yanchenko V. I., Rozova M. V., Mel'nik V. M. Ispol'zovanie zasuhoustoychivogo genofonda tverdoy yarovoy pshenicy v sozdanii vysokoadaptivnyh sortov sibirskogo ekotipa // Vestnik regional'noy seti po vnedreniyu sortov pshenicy i semenovodstvu. 2004. № 1-2 (7-8), S. 31-36.
13. Kobylyanskiy V. D., Safonova I. V., Soloduhina O. V., Anis'kov N. I. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po izucheniyu i sohraneniyu mirovoy kollekcii rzhi. Sankt-Peterburg: VIR. 2015. 44 s.
14. Kalybekova Zh. T., Cygankova V. I., Zuev E. V., Novikova L. Yu. Ispol'zovanie indeksov zasuhoustoychivosti pri izuchenii kollekcii yarovoy pshenicy v usloviyah Aktyubinskoy oblasti // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2022. T. 183. № 3. S. 85-89. DOI: 10.30901-2227-8834-2022-3-85-89.
15. Pakul' V. N., Plisko L. G. Zasuhoustoychivost' sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy // Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy zhurnal. 2018. № 2 (789). S. 49-52.
16. Vasilevskiy V. D. Indeksnaya ocenka zasuhoustoychivosti sortov myagkoy yarovoy pshenicy raznyh grupp spelosti v yuzhnoy lesostepi Zapadnoy Sibiri // Agrarnaya nauka - sel'skomu hozyaystvu: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Barnaul, 2019. S. 159-161.
17. Kravchenko N. S., Lihovidova V. A., Skripka O. V. Kachestvo zerna i zasuhoustoychivost' sortov ozimoy myagkoy pshenicy // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2018. № 1 (55). S. 52-56.
18. Sayfutdinova D. D., Ponomareva M. L., Ilalova L. V. Formirovanie urozhaynosti i kachestva zerna ozimoy rzhi v usloviyah nedostatochnogo uvlazhneniya // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2022. T. 14. № 5. S. 84-90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2022-82-5-84-90.
19. Nuzhdina N. N., Ermolaeva T. Ya., Kayrgalieva D. V., Liholetova E. A. Urozhaynost' i kachestvo zerna sovremennyh sortov ozimoy rzhi // Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetstkogo kompleksa: Nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2018. № 3 (51). S. 165-172.
20. Ponomareva M. L., Ponomarev S. N., Mannapova G. S., Gil'mullina L. F., Ilalova L. V., Vafina G. S. Novyy sort ozimoy rzhi Zilant s shirokoy adaptaciey // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2021. № 1 (73). S. 8-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2021-73-1-8-13.
21. Rosielle A. A., Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 1978. No. 21 (6). Rp. 943-946.
22. Bouslama M., Schapaugh W. T. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance // Crop Science. 1984. Vol. 24. Pp. 933-937. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x.
23. Lan J. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops // Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. 1998. № 7. Rp. 85-87.
24. Fernandez G. C. J. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance // Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water stress tolerance. Tainan, 1992. Pp. 257-270.
25. Zykin A. A., Meshkov V. V., Sapega V. A. Parametry ekologicheskoy plastichnosti sel'skohozyaystvennyh rasteniy, ih raschet i analiz: metodicheskie rekomendacii. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe otdelenie VASHNIL, 1984. 24 s.
26. Dospehov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoy obrabotki rezul'tatov issledovaniy). 5-e izd. Moskva: Al'yans, 2014. 351 s.
27. Novohatin V. V. Ekologicheskaya selekciya myagkoy pshenicy // Optimizaciya selekcionnogo processa - faktor stabilizacii i rosta produkcii rastenievodstva Sibiri (OSP-2019): materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii. Krasnoyarsk, 2019. S. 92-103.
28. Zhivotkov L. A., Morozova Z. A., Sekatueva L. I. Metodiki vyyavleniya potencial'noy produktivnosti sortov i selekcionnyh form ozimoy pshenicy po pokazatelyu urozhaynosti // Selekciya i semenovodstvo. 2014. № 2. S. 2-6.
