Abstract. The purpose of researches is influence legume crops and mineral fertilizers on crop rotation productivity and soil fertility elements in the conditions of Kaluga region. Methods. The research was carried out in a long-term stationary field experiment on gray forest medium loamy soil. The laying of field experience, observations, records and generalization of research results were carried out in accordance with generally accepted methodological recommendations. Results. It was found that the studied factors had an insignificant effect on the weed propensity, which, against the background of mineral fertilizers and with an increase in the share of legumes in the structure, was slightly higher. On average, during the fourth rotation, the highest crop productivity was obtained in a crop rotation with 40% saturation with legumes, both against the background of fertilization (38.6 c/ha of grain units) and without their use (32.6 c/ha of grain units). Applying of mineral fertilizers contributed to an increase in crop rotation productivity by 18–24 %. On average, for crop rotations, 6.4 c/ha of grain units or 22 % were obtained by applying mineral fertilizers in addition to a background without fertilizers. It’s noted that use of mineral fertilizers had a positive effect on the change some indicators of soil fertility. Availability of exchangeable forms potassium increased by 27 % and mobile phosphorus by 54 % compared to options without fertilizers. And in comparison with the initial state, the content of K2O without fertilizers increased by 17 and by 54 mg/kg of soil against the background of their use, and the content of P2O5 decreased by 27 mg/kg of soil and increased by 66 mg/kg, respectively. With an increase in the share of legumes in the structure of crop rotations from 30 % to 60 %, there was a slight increase in soil fertility, especially against the background of mineral fertilizers. Scientific novelty. The issues of influence legumes and mineral fertilizers on productivity of the fourth rotation of crop rotations and elements soil fertility were considered.
crop rotation, crop, legumes, mineral fertilizers, yield, fertility
1. Frolova L. D., Novikov M. N. Effektivnye tehnologii ispol'zovaniya podstilochnogo navoza v polevom sevooborote // Vladimirskiy zemledelec. 2020. № 3 (93). S. 55-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2225-2584-2020-10134. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MONCJX
2. Marchuk E. V., Zolkina E. I. Effektivnost' razlichnyh sistem udobreniya pri vozdelyvanii tritikale i yachmenya na dernovo-podzolistoy pochve // Vladimirskiy zemledelec. 2021. № 4. S. 20-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2225-2584-2021-4-20-26. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NMHLBY
3. Naliukhin A., Ryzhakova A., Eregin A. et al. Influence of the after effect of various fertilizer systems on the yield and quality of the green mass of meadow clover (Trifolium pratense) // Research on crops. 2021. Vol. 22. No. 3. Pp. 602-607. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2021.108. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DDTDNB
4. Naliuhin A. N., Hamitova S. M., Glinushkin A. P. Izmenenie metagenoma prokariotnogo soobschestva kak pokazatel' plodorodiya pahotnyh dernovo-podzolistyh pochv pri primenenii udobreniy // Pochvovedenie. 2018. № 3. S. 331-337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X18030073. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YTCCJW
5. Gritz N. V., Dichensky A. V. Impact of agricultural landscape conditions on botanical composition of legume-bluegrass mixtures: An analytical system of monitoring the state of agrocenoses // Research on Crops. 2020. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 231-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2020.040. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SHPSGE
6. Kononchuk V. V., Shtyrhunov V. D., Blagoveschenskiy G. V., Timoshenko S. M., Nazarova T. O. Effektivnost' i optimizaciya sistem udobreniya v sevooborotah s raznoy doley mnogoletnih trav na dernovo-podzolistoy pochve centra Nechernozemnoy zony Rossii // Agrohimiya. 2020. № 7. S. 36-46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120070078. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FVAYKN
7. Kuz'menko N. N. Vliyanie sistem udobreniya na pokazateli plodorodiya dernovo-podzolistoy pochvy // Vladimirskiy zemledelec. 2021. № 4. S. 10-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2225-2584-2021-4-10-14. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BWDGJZ
8. Vnesenie udobreniy v krupnyh, srednih i malyh (bez mikropredpriyatiy) sel'hozorganizaciyah Kaluzhskoy oblasti: statisticheskiy sbornik. Kaluga: Otdel ISU Kalugastata, 2021. 24 s.
9. Sokolov N. A., D'yachenko O. V., Bab'yak M. A. Tendencii biologizacii zemledeliya Bryanskoy oblasti // Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2021. № 2. S. 65-73. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HGJVAN
10. Chuyan N. A., Breskina G. M. Vliyanie priema biologizacii na biologicheskoe sostoyanie organicheskogo veschestva chernozema tipichnogo // Agrohimiya. 2020. № 9. S. 8-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120090033. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XKMGFQ
11. Postnikov P. A., Popova V. V., Vasina O. V., Tihanskaya E. L. Ispol'zovanie yarovogo rapsa v kachestve sideral'noy kul'tury v usloviyah Srednego Urala // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 5 (170). S. 20-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-5-20-27. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UFFEKM
12. Chulkov V. A., Chapalda T. L. Ocenka vliyaniya sideratov na biologicheskie svoystva chernozema opodzolennogo v zvene polevogo sevooborota // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2021. № 4 (207). S. 55-63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2021-207-04-55-63. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTQHMZ
13. Postnikov P. A., Popova V. V. Vliyanie udobreniy na urozhaynost' kul'tur i vynos pitatel'nyh elementov v zernoparosideral'nom sevooborote // Agrohimiya. 2021. № 4. S. 42-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S000218812104013X. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RQWIBI
14. Masalov V. N., Berezina N. A., Lobkov V. T., Bobkova Yu. A. Upravlenie plodorodiem pochv na osnove intensifikacii biologicheskih faktorov v sistemah zemledeliya // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2021. № 3 (90). S. 10-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.3.10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OJTMZI
15. Novoselov S. I., Kuz'minyh A. N. Vliyanie vidov para i sposobov osnovnoy obrabotki pochvy na ee plodorodie i produktivnost' sevooborotov // Vestnik Chuvashskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2019. № 3 (10). S. 42-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17022/tyem-sd29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JFVVEZ
16. Vihoreva G. V., Shishkina S. V. Vliyanie priemov biologizacii na povyshenie plodorodiya pochv Verhnevolzh'ya // Vladimirskiy zemledelec. 2022. № 2 (100). S. 10-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2225-2584-2022-2-10-13; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KMSAPB
17. Kulikova A. H., Yashin E. A., Cherkasov E. A., Volkova E. S. Rol' organicheskih udobreniy (solomy, sideratov, pozhnivno-kornevyh ostatkov) v vosproizvodstve i sohranenii gumusa v pochve // Vestnik Ul'yanovskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2022. № 4. S. 53-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18286/1816-4501-2022-4-53-58. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NBJZSH
18. Korzhov S. I., Solodovnikov A. P., Pimonov K. I., Nesmeyanova M. A. Vliyanie bobovyh kul'tur na plodorodie pochvy i produktivnost' sevooborotov // Agrohimicheskiy vestnik. 2022. № 3. S. 54-59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/1029-2551-2022-3-010. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VWADZD
19. Dospehov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta. Moskva: Kolos, 1973. 336 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZJTYLB
