Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract. The purpose is to form strategic guidelines for socio-economic growth of the quality of life and ensuring the quality of nutrition of the population. Methodology and methods. In the course of the study, both general and universal methods were used (sociological survey, ranking, systematization, classification and interpretation, analysis and synthesis), including the method of comparison in the development and justification of the relationship of life quality indicators with the quality of nutrition and the tasks of ensuring food security of Russia. Results. The article considers the evolution of approaches to the level and quality of life where the role and importance of a person in sustainable socio-economic development comes to the fore. The analysis of the approaches used by the international community to assess the quality of life made it possible to correlate indicators and indicators to the category of nutrition quality, as well as to build a relationship with the criteria and objectives of food security in Russia, enshrined in the Doctrine. The authors conducted a sociological survey among the urban and rural working-age population of the Sverdlovsk region to identify factors that form the conditions of the quality of life and the quality of nutrition. The scientific novelty consists in identifying and constructing a classification of the relationship between the criteria of the quality of life and the quality of nutrition with the tasks of food security in Russia. And also in the formation of an evidence base for the dependence of structural indicators of the level and quality of life in the hierarchy of values of a household and an individual.
quality of life, quality of nutrition, food security, food, rational norms, consumption dynamics
1. Truba A. S., Mozhaev E. E., Markov A. K. Povyshenie energoeffektivnosti v APK // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2020. № 8. S. 45-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32651/208-45.
2. Solozhencev E. D., Karaseva E. I., Rasputin A. A., Yakovlev M. B. Upravlenie kachestvom zhizni cheloveka v cifrovoy ekonomike // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya. 2020. № 1 (25). S. 66-71.
3. Samohin A. V., Myasnikov S. A. Vzaimosvyaz' sub'ektivnyh i ob'ektivnyh pokazateley v ocenke kachestva zhizni (na primere Indeksa VEB RF) // Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plehanova. 2023. T. 20. № 1. S. 38-54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2023-1-38-54.
4. Gelbreyt D. K. Obschestvo izobiliya / Per. s angl. Moskva: Olimp Biznes, 2018. 404 s. (Seriya INIR im. S. Yu. Vitte «Sovremennaya ekonomicheskaya mysl'»).
5. Kulazhenkova M. A. Ocenka obosnovannosti celevyh pokazateley obespecheniya kachestva zhizni pri provedenii razlichnyh vidov i form kontrolya za razrabotkoy i realizaciey dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya // Prikladnye ekonomicheskie issledovaniya. 2023. № 1. S. 50-55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1908_2023_1_50.
6. Schekotin E. V. Koncepciya kachestva zhizni v kontekste sovremennogo kvalitativizma // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2020. № 7 (149). S. 37-39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2020.7.5.
7. Kamenskaya O. V. Razrabotka podhoda k ocenke kachestva zhizni naseleniya v regionah Rossii // Finansovye rynki i banki. 2022. № 6. S. 23-29.
8. Gubarev R. V., Dzyuba E. I., Kulikova O. M., Fayzullin F. S. Upravlenie kachestvom zhizni naseleniya v regionah Rossii // Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovaniy. 2019. T. 11. № 2. S. 146-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.2.146-170.
9. Edrenkina N. M., Suchkov A. I., Lisicin A. E. Metodicheskiy podhod k ocenke kachestva zhizni sel'skogo naseleniya // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2022. № 6. S. 90-97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33305/226-90.
10. Okrepilov V. V., Chudinovskih I. V. Formirovanie podhodov k primeneniyu standartizacii dlya ocenki kachestva zhizni // Peterburgskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2018. № 1. S. 6-15.
11. Ishnazarova Z. M. Regional'noe upravlenie kachestvom zhizni naseleniya: programmno-celevoy podhod // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. 2022. № 6-1. S. 82-86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.2249.
12. Solov'eva N. L., Chudinovskih I. V. Standartizaciya kak instrument dostizheniya ustoychivogo razvitiya organizaciy sfery social'nyh uslug // Kachestvo i zhizn'. 2020. № 1 (25). S. 35-41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34214/2312-5209-2020-25-1-35-41.
13. Idigova L. M., Israilova S. A. Uroven' i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: ponyatie, pokazateli, standarty // FGU Science. 2018. № 1 (11). S. 70-74.
14. Agarkova L. V., Gurnovich T. G., Glotova I. I., Tomilina E. P. Obosnovanie ob'emov finansirovaniya sel'skih territoriy dlya dostizheniya pokazateley standartov kachestva zhizni // Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 99. S. 13-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-99-13-18.
15. Kuznecova L. M., Pilyugina P. M. Indeks razvitiya chelovecheskogo potenciala kak osnovnoy strategicheskiy instrument koncepcii razvitiya cheloveka // Ekonomicheskaya sreda. 2019. № 2 (28). S. 54-60.
16. Semin A. N., Kurdymov A. V. International food security regulation assessment // Opcion. 2018. Vol. 34. No. 85. Pp. 628-651.
17. Bukhtiyarova T. I., Semin A. N., Demyanov D. G., Tenetko A. A., Nemykina Yu. S. Competitiveness of rural areas: formation, assessment, growth reserves aspects // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science : III International Scientific Conference: AGRITECH-III-2020: Agribusiness, Environmental Engineering and Biotechnologies. Volgograd, Krasnoyarsk, 2020. Vol. 548. Article number 22055. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/548/2/022055.
18. Skvorcov E. A. Perspektivy primeneniya tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta v sel'skom hozyaystve regiona // Ekonomika regiona. 2020. T. 16. № 2. S. 563-576. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-17.
19. Chizh K. D., Kuznecova N. A. Obespechenie prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti Omskoy oblasti // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoy ekonomiki. 2022. № 7. S. 653-657.
