employee from 01.01.2005 to 01.01.2020
Zernograd, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
employee
Zernograd, Russian Federation
Abstract. The stripping of grain allows organizing the separate harvesting of grain for feed in early phases and for food purposes in the phase of full ripeness. Purpose. To carry out the economic justification of the technology of harvesting early ripening grains by stripping without threshing and the technology of preparing pelleted fish feed for fish from unthreshed ears and additives. Methods. Economical estimation of the technology of winter wheat harvesting by stripping in early phases of ripeness without threshing and its processing into feed has been carried out by comparing operational and indicated expenses of the total technological operations. Scientific novelty lies in the joint estimation of the economic efficiency of technologies of harvesting and processing of grain crops. Results. The prime cost of harvesting cereals without threshing and separation is 2.65 times lower than that of the harvesting technology with combine threshing and separation. The cost of performing operations under the traditional (from grain) and the new (from ears) technologies of pelleted fish feed production is almost equal. However, the total cost of technological operations of harvesting grain without threshing and preparation of pelleted feed from unthreshed ears using the new technology is 24.3 % lower than that of traditional technology of harvesting with threshing and preparation of feed from grain. The use of non-grain part of ears of early ripeness in the composition of feed will increase the amount of raw material from hectare of sown area by 20–30 %. The proposed technologies is cost-effective and promising for implementation in the agricultural enterprises of southern Russia.
wheat, stripping harvesting, ears, early phases of ripeness, pelleted feed, economic efficiency, feed cost
1. Kim S. W., Less J. F., Wang L., Yan T., Kiron V., Kaushik S. J., Lei X. G. Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy // Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2019. Vol. 7. Pp. 221-243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838.
2. Revesz N., Biro J. Recent trends in fish feed ingredients - mini review. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis. 2019. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 32-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2286.
3. Alt D. S., Paul P. A., Lindsey A. J., Lindsey L. E. Early wheat harvest influenced grain quality and profit but not yield // Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2019.01.0001.
4. Brusencov A. S., Tumanova M. I., Chulakov Ya. B. K voprosu povysheniya effektivnosti uborki nezernovoy chasti urozhaya dlya prigotovleniya grubyh kormov // Traktory i sel'hozmashiny. 2019. № 5. S. 55-60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31992/0321-4443-2019-5-55-60.
5. Chemodanov S. I., Patrin P. A., Patrin V. A., Sabashkin V. A. Rezul'taty ochesa vysokovlazhnoy rastitel'noy massy pshenicy // Sibirskiy vestnik sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki. 2019. Vol. 49. No. 6. S. 96-103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2019-6-11.
6. Astanakulov K. Wheat ripening dynamics in Uzbekistan for harvesting it in earlier periods // E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 264. Article number 04074. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126404074.
7. Damanskiy R. V., Chekusov M. S., Kem A. A., Mihal'cov E. M., Shmidt A. N. Ocenka tehnologii uborki zernovyh kul'tur metodom ochesa na kornyu // Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2023. № 1. S. 145-151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48136/2222-0364_2023_1_145.
8. Buryanov A., Chervyakov I. Using combines for cleaning grain crops by non-traditional technologies // INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering. 2019. Vol. 58. No. 3. S. 27-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35633/INMATEH-59-03.
9. Bur'yanov A. I., Zaycev S. G., Chervyakov I. V. Sposob i sredstva uborki zernovyh kul'tur ochesom s razdeleniem voroha na stacionare // Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018. № 140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-140-001.
10. Alabushev A. V., Buryanov A. I., Pakhomov V. I., Kolinko A. A., Chervyakov I. V. Development of a method to control threshing process based on properties of harvested crop variety and external factors // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. T. 422. Article number 012005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/422/1/012005.
11. Berenshteyn I. B., Shabanov N. P. Novye vozmozhnosti tehnologii «Neveyka» pri uborke zernovyh kul'tur // Izvestiya sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki Tavridy. 2018. № 16. S. 52-66.
12. Berenshteyn I. B., Gonchar I. V. Tehniko-ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' dvuhfaznoy uborki zernovyh (kolosovyh) kul'tur s posleuborochnoy utilizaciey solomy // Izvestiya sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki Tavridy. 2017. № 11. S. 51-60.
13. Bershickiy Yu. I., Kastidi Yu. K. Effektivnost' uborki zernovyh metodom ochesa // Sel'skiy mehanizator. 2022. № 1. S. 8-9.
14. Buryanov A. I., Chervyakov I. V., Kolin’ko A. A. Strength Testing of Stripping Cylinder's Tooth // INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering. 2021. Vol. 65. No. 3. Pp. 67-72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35633/INMATEH-65-07.
15. Dujmovic M., Safran B., Jug M., Radmanovic K., Antonovic A. Biomass Pelletizing Process: A Review // Drvna Industrija. 2022. Vol. 73. No. 1. Pp. 99-106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2022.2139.
16. Schroeder B., Andretta I., Kipper M., Franceschi C. H., Remus A. Empirical modelling the quality of pelleted feed for broilers and pigs // Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020. Vol. 265. Article number 114522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114522.
17. Blagov D. A., Gizatov A. Y., Smakuyev D. R., Kosilov V. I., Pogodaev V. A., Tamaev S. A. Overview of feed granulation technology and technical means for its implementation // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. Vol. 613. Article number 012018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012018.
18. Lysyuk A. I., Vodyannikov V. T. Sovershenstvovanie metodiki ocenki effektivnosti sel'skohozyaystvennoy tehniki // Vestnik MGAU im. Goryachkina. 2018. № 4. S. 53-58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26897/1728-7936-2018-4-53-58.
19. Suharev A. A., Ignat'eva N. G., Yankovskiy N. G. Vliyanie srokov i sposobov uborki na urozhaynost' ozimoy myagkoy pshenicy // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2014. № 4. S. 52-58.
20. Ryadnov A. I., Fedorova O. A., Poddubnyy O. I. Poteri zerna ot uvelicheniya srokov uborki zernovyh kul'tur // Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: Nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2020. № 2. S. 375-384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2020-02-37.
21. Berenshteyn I. B., Volozhaninov S. S., Vysockaya N. D. Tehnologiya trehfaznoy kombaynovoy uborki pshenicy i yachmenya s posleuborochnoy obrabotkoy zerna i solomy // Izvestiya sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki Tavridy. 2018. № 15. S. 83-96.
22. Poluektova N. R., Berenshteyn I. B. Ocenka ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti tehnologiy uborki pshenicy na osnovanii metodov granichnogo analiza // Izvestiya sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki Tavridy. 2018. № 15. S. 177-188.
23. Ivanisov M. M., Marchenko D. M., Nekrasov E. I. Ocenka sortov ozimoy myagkoy pshenicy v mezhstancionnom ispytanii po hozyaystvenno-cennym priznakam // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2022. № 1. S. 11-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2022-79-1-11-16
24. Ivanisov M. M., Marchenko D. M., Kravchenko N. S., Kopus' M. M. Izuchenie pokazateley kachestva sovremennyh sortov ozimoy pshenicy selekcii FGBNU «ANC «Donskoy» // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2023. № 1. S. 35-41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2023-84-1-35-41