employee
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tyumen, Russian Federation
Successful breeding of spring wheat varieties that are productive, have high grain quality, and are well adapted to Siberian conditions depends on the availability and knowledge of the source material. In this regard, the purpose of the research: to study the influence of the timing of sowing early ripe varieties of winter wheat and winter wheat varieties of alternate wheat on the yield and quality of grain in the northern forest-steppe of the Tyumen region. Methods. There were used in the study of generally accepted methods in the State Variety Test. Scientific novelty. In the conditions of the forest-steppe zone of the Tyumen region, new varieties of early ripening winter wheat Rannyaya 12, Skorospelka 3b, Starshina and alternate wheat varieties Pallada, Lastochka. Results. In 2022–2023 we studied on the experimental field of the State Agrarian University of the Northern Trans-Urals the influence of pre-winter and early spring sowing dates on the yield and quality of grain. It was established that during winter sowing (October 15) and early spring (April 22), the studied wheat varieties grew and developed normally. At the same time, they formed a well-developed leaf surface, of medium height, and straw resistant to lodging. In both years of research, the studied varieties ripened in the third ten days of August. The yield with winter sowing was 59.5–71.0 c/ha, for the spring standard variety Ikar – 41.9, with early spring sowing – 51.2–65.4 c/ha, for the standard variety 35.3. Productivity was combined with grain quality: protein content – 14.5–16.4 %, gluten – 29.0–34.2 %. The wheat varieties under study must be used in hybridization with spring varieties, as well as seed propagation must continue to establish a production test.
wheat, variety, sowing period, yield, grain quality, alternate wheat, productivity, Tyumen region
1. Vasilyuk P. N., Ulych L. I. Agrobiologicheskie osobennosti sortov-dvuruchek pshenicy myagkoy (Triticum aestivum L.) // Sortovivchennya ta ohorona prav na sorti roslin. 2012. № 2 (16). S. 4–7.
2. Ganockaya T. L., Neschadim N. N., Koval' A. V., Radchenko L. A., Radchenko A. F. Izuchenie produktivnosti i kachestva sortov pshenicy dvuruchki pri poseve v ozimyy i yarovoy sroki // Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2021. № 168. S. 288–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-168-021.
3. Gorodov V. T., Kloster N. I. Adaptacionnyy potencial yarovo-ozimyh gibridov pshenicy v selekcii dvuruchek // Innovacii v APK: problemy i perspektivy. 2022. № 4 (36). S. 74–82.
4. Neschadim N. N., Ganockaya T. L., Koval' A. V. Urozhaynost' zerna sortov pshenicy dvuruchki pri poseve v razlichnye sroki // The Scientific Heritage. 2021. № 73-1 (73). S. 12–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/9215-0365-2021-73-1-12-18.
5. Fisunov N. V., Moiseev A. N., Moiseev E. A. Agrofitocenoz i urozhaynost' ozimoy pshenicy po osnovnoy obrabotke na opytnom pole GAU Severnogo Zaural'ya // Uspehi molodezhnoy nauki v agropromyshlennom komplekse: sbornik trudov LVII Studencheskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Tyumen': Gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet Severnogo Zaural'ya, 2022. S. 224–233.
6. Moiseeva K. V., Filatova V. N. Rol' ozimyh zernovyh kul'tur v zernovom balanse na primere Tyumenskoy oblasti // Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 1 (68). S. 44–47.
7. Tedeeva A. A., Tedeeva V. V. Urozhaynost' ozimoy pshenicy v zavisimosti ot srokov i norm vyseva // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2023. № 5 (234). S. 36–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2023-234-05-36-48.
8. Neschadim N. N., Ganockaya T. L., Koval' A. V. Urozhaynost' sortov pshenicy dvuruchki pri poseve v ozimyy i yarovoy sroki // The Scientific Heritage. 2021. № 73-1 (73). S. 18–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/9215-0365-2021-73-1-18-24.
9. Filobok V. A., Guenkova E. A., Bespalova L. A. Koshkin V. A., Potokina E. K. Sozdanie adaptirovannogo genofonda al'ternativnogo obraza zhizni myagkoy pshenicy // Zernovoe hozyaystvo Rossii. 2016. № 1. S. 38–42.
10. Fayt V. I., Gubich E. Yu., Zelenina G. A. Razlichiya sortov dvuruchek myagkoy pshenicy po genam Vrn-1 tipa razvitiya // Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2018. T. 14, № 2. S. 160–169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.14.2.2018.134762.
11. Loginov Yu. P., Kazak A. A., Yaschenko S. N. Vliyanie sroka seva na urozhaynost' i kachestvo zerna pshenicy dvuruchek v severnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 2023. № 7 (35). DOI:https://doi.org/10.23649/JAE.2023.35.2.
12. Yaschenko S. N., Loginov Yu. P., Kazak A. A. Strukturnye elementy semyan sortov pshenicy v zavisimosti ot srokov seva i norm vyseva v Severnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2022. № 9 (186). S. 55–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-9-55-66.
13. Loginov Yu. P. Rost, razvitie i urozhaynost' sortov pshenicy dvuruchki v zavisimosti ot srokov seva v severnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Agroprodovol'stvennaya politika Rossii. 2022. № 2-3. S. 10–15.
14. Miller S. S. Sposob osnovnoy obrabotki pochvy kak glavnyy faktor formirovaniya urozhaya yarovoy pshenicy v severnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 2023. № 11 (39). DOI:https://doi.org/10.23649/JAE.2023.39.17.
15. Rzaeva V. V. Vozdelyvanie sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur v Tyumenskoy oblasti // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 3 (168). S. 3–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-3-3-8.
16. Kazak A. A., Loginov Yu. P., Yaschenko S. N. Posevnye kachestva semyan v zavisimosti ot srokov seva i norm vyseva v severnoy lesostepi Tyumenskoy oblasti // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2022. № 10 (187). S. 3–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-10-3-15.
17. Mezhdzhunov P. Z., Yakubyshina L. I. Prodolzhitel'nost' posleuborochnogo dozrevaniya semyan sortov myagkoy pshenicy // Uspehi molodezhnoy nauki v agropromyshlennom komplekse: sbornik trudov LVI Studencheskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Tyumen': Gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet Severnogo Zaural'ya, 2021. S. 148–151.
18. Mal'ceva L. T., Filippova E. A., Bannikova N. Yu. Reakciya yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy na Zasuhu v lesostepi Zaural'ya // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2021. № 12 (215). S. 9–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2021-215-12-9-18.
19. Potockaya I. V., Shamanin V. P., Shepelev S. S. Pozherukova V. E., Morgunov A. I. Sinteticheskaya pshenica kak istochnik uluchsheniya kachestva zerna v selekcii pshenicy // Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2019. № 2. S. 56–63.
20. Moiseeva A. A., Karmackih A. A., Moiseeva K. V. Fotosintez list'ev i produktivnost' ozimoy pshenicy // Simbioz-Rossiya 2019: materialy XI Vserossiyskogo kongressa molodyh uchenyh-biologov s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Perm': Permskiy gosudarstvennyy nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet, 2019. S. 222–223.
21. Ahtarieva M. K., Belkina R. I. Sravnitel'naya ocenka sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy raznyh grupp spelosti po pokazatelyam kachestva // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 12 (177). S. 88–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-12-88-92.
22. Belkina R. I., Letyago Yu. A., Vydrin V. V., Fedoruk T. K. Kachestvo zerna sortov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy v usloviyah podtaezhnoy zony Tyumenskoy oblasti // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2021. № 3 (168). S. 15–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-3-15-21.
23. Malkanduev H. A., Shamurzaev R. I., Malkandueva A. H. Ponyatie i trebovaniya k kachestvu zerna pshenicy // Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2022. № 6 (110). S. 203–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35330/1991-6639-2022-6-110-203-216.
