Abstract. A long period of consumer maturity and the keeping quality of pear fruits are qualities that, when crossed with wild, highly hardy species, are poorly manifested in hybrid offspring. The purpose of the work is to evaluate the quality of fruits and yields on pear varieties with different levels of winter hardiness in the conditions of the forest-steppe zone of the Chelyabinsk region. Methods. The study was conducted at the Chelyabinsk State Variety testing site for fruit and berry crops. The 2009 bookmark experience included 68 varieties and promising numbers, some of which were excluded from the discussion due to very low yields. Scientific novelty. With good regenerative ability, less hardy varieties with high fruit qualities are not inferior in yield to hardy varieties. Results. In the group of hardy varieties (with the highest freezing score of 2), fruits are often characterized by low fruit qualities, medium-sized, high content of stony cells and other disadvantages. In the group of insufficiently hardy varieties, there are significantly more varieties with high fruit qualities. In the group of hardy varieties, the average annual yield ranges from 29.3 c/ha (Lel’) to 171.6 c/ha (Kuyumskaya). In the group of slightly hardy varieties – from 23.6 c/ha (Zabava) to 100.1 c/ha (Zolotoy shar). With a difference in the average yield values for varieties (84.3 c/ha for hardy and 46.3 c/ha for weakly hardy), statistical processing did not reveal significant differences between the groups in the degree of winter hardiness. In the conditions of the Southern Urals, some varieties bred in northern latitudes are prone to maceration of the pulp at the time of maturation.
maceration, consumer maturity, regenerative ability, fertility
1. Telezhinskiy D. D. Nasledovanie priznaka pozdnego sroka sozrevaniya plodov v gibridnom potomstve ussuriyskoy grushi // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2014. T. 40. № 2. S. 228–232.
2. Zarickiy A. V. Ishodnyy material dlya sozdaniya sortov grushi osennego sroka sozrevaniya v usloviyah Amurskoy oblasti // Agropromyshlennyy kompleks: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Blagoveschensk, 2023. T. 1. S. 51–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22450/9785964205385_1_51.
3. Telezhinskiy D. D. Nasledovanie zimostoykosti v gibridnom potomstve ussuriyskoy grushi // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2011. № 1 (80). S. 62–63.
4. Semeykina V. M. Ocenka zimostoykosti gibridnogo fonda grushi selekcii otdela «Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut sadovodstva Sibiri im. M. A. Lisavenko» FGBNU FANCA // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2019. T. 58. S. 295–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2019-58-295-300.
5. Lohova A. I. Zimostoykost' sortov grushi v usloviyah stepnoy zony Yuzhnogo Urala // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2023. № 72. S. 7–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2023-72-7-12.
6. Telezhinskiy D. D. Nasledovanie krupnoplodnosti v potomstve ot grushi ussuriyskoy // Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo. 2011. № 5. S. 18–20.
7. Telezhinskiy D. D. Nasledovanie vkusa plodov v potomstve ussuriyskoy grushi Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2011. T. 28, № 2. S. 250–256.
8. Tarasova G. N., Telezhinskiy D. D. Novyy sort grushi Chusovaya i ego selekcionnaya cennost' // Agrarnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2024. № 1. S. 61–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2024i1pp61-66.
9. Wang X., Liu S., Liu C., Liu Y., Lu X., Du G., Lyu D. Biochemical characterization and expression analysis of lignification in two pear (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) varieties with contrasting stone cell content // Protoplasma. 2020. Vol. 257. Pp. 261–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01434-7.
10. Li N., Ma Y., Song Y., Tian C., Zhang L., Li L. Anatomical studies of stone cells in fruits of four different pear cultivars // International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2017. Vol. 19, No. 4. Pp. 610–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0304.
11. Cheng Y., Liu L., Feng Y., Dong Y., Guan J. Effects of 1-MCP on fruit quality and core browning in ‘Yali’ pear during cold storage // Scientia Horticulturae. 2019. Vol. 243. Pp. 350–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.041.
12. Izmenenie klimata na Urale / A. A. Vasil'ev, D. Yu. Nohrin, N. V. Glaz [i dr.]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. 2023. 86 s.
13. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur. Vyp. V. Moskva: Kolos, 1970. 160 s.
14. Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyh, yagodnyh i orehoplodnyh kul'tur / Pod red. E. N. Sedova, T. P. Ogol'covoy. Orel: VNIISPK, 1999. 608 s.
15. Vasil'ev A. A., Gasymov F. M., Glaz N. V. Ocenka ekologicheskoy plastichnosti i stabil'nosti sortov grushi v usloviyah Chelyabinskoy oblasti // APK Rossii. 2019. T. 26, № 3. S. 333–337.
16. Tarasova G. N. Komponenty produktivnosti novyh sortov i selekcionnyh form grushi na Srednem Urale // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2020. T. 181. № 2. S. 101–107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2020-2-101-107.
17. Lisina A. V., Danilova A. A. Vliyanie pogodnyh usloviy na sozrevanie i kachestvo plodov grushi // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2014. T. 38, № 1. S. 249–254.
18. Franck C., Lammertyn J., Ho Q. T., Verboven P., Verlinden B., Nicolaï B. M. Browning disorders in pear fruit // Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2007. Vol. 43, Iss. 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.08.008.
19. Prichko T. G., Smelik T. L. Izmenenie biohimicheskogo sostava plodov grushi pri hranenii v zavisimosti ot sortovyh osobennostey // Nauchnye trudy SKZNIISiV. 2017. № 12. S. 164–168.
20. Kolesnikova L. S., Marinesku M. F., Svetlichenko V. Yu. Vliyanie osobennostey hraneniya na anatomo-morfologicheskie i nekotorye biohimicheskie pokazateli plodov grushi raznoy lezhkosposobnosti // Selekciya i sortorazvedenie sadovyh kul'tur. 2019. T. 6, № 1. S. 54–56.
21. Lohova A. I., Feschenko E. M. Kachestvo i biohimicheskiy sostav plodov grushi v usloviyah Yuzhnogo Urala // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 5 (97). S. 93–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37670/2073-0853-2022-97-5-93-98.
