PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF CULTIVATION OF PLUM VARIETIES UNDER ARID CONDITIONS OF THE ASTRAKHAN REGION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. Purpose. The study of biometric growth indicators, the peculiarities of the passage of the main phenological phases of development, the study of early maturity, yield and commercial qualities of fruits of various varieties of plum, substantiation of the possibility and economic feasibility of their use for setting up intensive plantings in the arid conditions of the Astrakhan region. Methods. Research is carried out in the arid conditions of the Northern Caspian region, in the laboratory of fruit and horticultural crops of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, to study the most promising variety-rootstock combinations of plums, according to the method of variety study of fruit crops for subsequent selection and recommendation of the most promising for industrial gardening. Results. Based on the data obtained and analyzed, the highest level of profitability was obtained for varieties of plum Kubanskaya rannyaya (71.4 %) with a productivity of 2.48 kg/m3 of crown volume, and a payback of 1.79 rubles. for 1 rub. invested costs, and Anna Szpet (77.3 %) with a productivity of 1.07 kg/m3 of crown volume, with a payback of 1.77 rubles. for 1 rub. investment costs. Comparing the research results, it is concluded that the Kubanskaya rannyaya variety, which is the most profitable for industrial cultivation, has a higher productivity potential and more efficiently uses the planting area in comparison with other studied varieties. This variety can be recommended for intensive gardens in the Astrakhan region. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that, despite the wide assortment of plums that exists today, for each zone it is necessary to select both varieties and rootstocks for stable and economically viable fruit production.

Keywords:
plum, phenology, variety, flowering, fruiting, yield, fruit weight
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Eremin V. G., Eremin G. V. Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya v promyshlennom sadovodstve Rossii klonovyh podvoev kostochkovyh kul'tur // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. T. 50. S. 111-115.

2. Eremin G. V., Eremin V. G. Ispol'zovanie genofonda dikorastuschih vidov roda Prunus L.v selekcii klonovyh podvoev kostochkovyh kul'tur // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2015. T. 176. № 4. S. 416-425. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2015-4-416-428.

3. Eremin G. V., Eremin V. G. Sovershenstvovanie sortimenta klonovyh podvoev dlya kostochkovyh kul'tur // Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018. № 73. S. 60-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1999-1703-73-60-64.

4. Pérez-Jiménez M., Hernández-Munuera M., Carmen Piñero M., López-Ortega G., del Amor F. M. Are commercial sweet cherry rootstocks adapted to climate change? Short-term waterlogging and CO2 effects on sweet cherry cv. ‘Burlat’ // Plant, Cell & Environment. 2018. Vol. 41. Iss. 5. Pp. 908-918.

5. Solonkin A. V., Eremin G. V. Ispol'zovanie mestnyh i novyh sortov Nizhnego Povolzh'ya v selekcii adaptivnyh sortov slivy // Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2017. № 134. S. 368-378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-134-031.

6. Solonkin A. V., Nikol'skaya O. A., Kikteva E. N. Predvaritel'naya ocenka sorto-podvoynyh kombinaciy slivy v usloviyah Nizhnego Povolzh'ya // Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2019. № 1 (53) S. 105-113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2019-01-13.

7. Solonkin A. V., Zvolinskiy V. P., Ivanenko E. N., Aleksandrova T. I. Kompleksnaya ocenka sortov slivy v usloviyah intensivnogo sada Severnogo Prikaspiya // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy APK. 2019. № 4. S. 35-39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32935/2221-7312-2019-42-4-35-38.

8. Popov M. A., Novotorcev A. A. Sorto-podvoynye kombinacii vishni i slivy v sredney polose RF // Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK. 2017. T. 31. № 7. S. 30-32.

9. Jiménez S., Fattahi M., Bedis K., Nasrolahpour-moghadam S., Irigoyen J. J., Gogorcena Y. Interactional effects of climate change factors on the water status, photosynthetic rate, and metabolic regulation in peach // Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 43.

10. Joshua J., Mmbaga M. T., Mackasmiel L. A. Cherry leaf spot disease management in ornamental cherries in mid-Tennessee // Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2017. Vol. 97 (1). Pp. 110-118.

11. Ivanenko E. N., Menshutina T. V., Aleksandrova T. I. Podbor sorto-podvoynyh kombinaciy slivy dlya aridnyh usloviy Severnogo Prikaspiya // Nauchnoe obespechenie ustoychivogo razvitiya plodovodstva i dekorativnogo sadovodstva: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 125-letiyu VNIICiSK i 85-letiyu Botanicheskogo sada «Derevo Druzhby». Sochi, 2019. S. 170-173.

12. Ivanenko E. N., Dronik A. A., Aleksandrova T. I. Hozyaystvenno-biologicheskaya harakteristika sortov slivy pri vyraschivanii v usloviyah intensivnogo sada [tekst] // Dostizheniya molodyh uchenyh v razvitii sel'skohozyaystvennoy nauki i APK: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii molodyh uchenyh. Solenoe Zaymische, 2019. S. 73-77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26150/PAFNC.2019.45.557-2-019.

13. Sovremennye metodologiya, instrumentariy ocenki i otbora selekcionnogo materiala sadovyh kul'tur i vinograda: monografiya / Pod red. E. A. Egorova, G. V. Eremina, I. A. Il'ina, R. Sh. Zaremuk, E. V. Ul'yanovskoy, V. S. Petrova. Krasnodar: FGBNU SKFNCSVV, 2017. 282 s.

14. Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyh, yagodnyh i orehoplodnyh kul'tur. Orel: VNIISPK, 1999. - 606s.

15. Bogdanov R. E., Yushkov A. N., Zemisov A. S., Borzyh N. V. Izuchenie zimostoykosti sortov slivy s ispol'zovaniem opticheskih metodov // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. T. 49. S. 52-55.

16. Zaremuk R. Sh. Produktivnost' i ekologicheskaya plastichnost' slivy (Prunus domestica) v nestabil'nyh usloviyah // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2015. T.50. № 1. S. 85-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2015.1.85rus.

17. Lukicheva L. A., Gorina V. M. Ocenka produktivnosti sortov slivy domashney (Prunus domestica) selekcii Nikitskogo botanicheskogo sada // Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2018. № 4. S. 81-85.

18. Ashurbaeva M., Rasulova A., Abdullaev Sh. Himicheskie sostavlyayuschie slivy // Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk: materialy XXII mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Moskva, 2015. S. 35-37.

19. Pouh E. V., Shudlovskiy A. F. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' vyraschivaniya slivy domashney sorta Viktoriya na semennyh i klonovyh podvoyah // Plodovodstvo: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Samohvalovichi, Belarus', 2015. S. 93-100.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?